Re: Spam messages bypassing SA

2014-10-23 Thread geoff . spamassassin140903
On 23/10/2014 23:00, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 10/23/2014 5:47 PM, geoff.spamassassin140...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote: On 04/09/2014 11:29, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Using procmail without MTA glue is OK for many uses. I am wondering how many spamd connections you allow and if you have checked you

Re: Spam messages bypassing SA

2014-10-23 Thread geoff . spamassassin140903
On 04/09/2014 15:56, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Geoff Soper wrote: I've got an issue whereby spam messages seem to be somehow bypassing SA and getting into my inbox. :0fw: spamassassin.lock * < 40 | spamc -x Are the messages that bypass SA always rather large? No, unfortu

Re: Spam messages bypassing SA

2014-10-23 Thread geoff . spamassassin140903
On 04/09/2014 11:29, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Using procmail without MTA glue is OK for many uses. I am wondering how many spamd connections you allow and if you have checked your logs? I also cannot remember but the uses of a lock file seem odd for something that can thread. Any one know if