Re: New SA-3.0.2 partially barfs.

2005-03-24 Thread gallen
SA does not allow running it as 'root' user. It is considered a security risk. SA files also should not be in 'root' user folder. Should be in something like /var/filter/.spamassassin (filter being the name of the user) You need to have a user such as 'filter' run it. Here is a fairly good write

Re: a more effective spam defense

2005-03-23 Thread gallen
This reminded me of this page I read the other day. ;-) (no offense) http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html It's an amusing read if anyone hasn't seen it yet. > Two of the great things I have gleaned from this list are: > > 1. Greylisting is reported to stop upwards of 80-90% of

Re: ZDNET redirecting to spammer websites?

2005-03-21 Thread gallen
If you right click on that link you will see the real URL which is.. http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/supposedtoallow/fdl.viags.com/p/b/kmioa "fdl.viags.com" The stuff in front is just to hide the real url and to re-direct your effort. So I would not give zdnet too hard of a time, else they my have

RE: ZDNET redirecting to spammer websites?

2005-03-21 Thread gallen
Woops, I stepped into that one big time. Sorry you are right. Some things are not as simple as they look. ;-) > What on earth are you talking about?! It is an open redirect! I'd love for > them to have a few choice words for me. Here try this: > > http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/blahblahwhatever

Re: ZDNET redirecting to spammer websites?

2005-03-21 Thread gallen
Let's try this again... My first response got lost in the ether. If you right click on that link you will see the real URL which is.. http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/supposedtoallow/fdl.viags.com/p/b/kmioa "fdl.viags.com" The stuff in front is just to hide the real url and to re-direct your effor

Re: Porn Spam

2005-03-21 Thread gallen
You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to write special rules. > I have a

Re: Spammers Target Secondary MX hosts?

2005-03-19 Thread gallen
I just had the reverse problem. Working for a large company using Exchange for outbound business email we were always hitting one company's secondary MX which was broken (sent back rejections). Our servers just liked the second MX better than the primary MX for some reason. When I manually telnete