>
>> On 2/16/2012 4:54 PM, email builder wrote:
>
>>>> but it's misconfigured trusted_networks and
>>>> internal_networks what causes SPF to misfire...
>>> Thank you sincerely for your help. I can only imagine that SPF
>>> wo
> On 2/16/2012 4:54 PM, email builder wrote:
>>> but it's misconfigured trusted_networks and
>>> internal_networks what causes SPF to misfire...
>> Thank you sincerely for your help. I can only imagine that SPF wouldn't
>> fire if I accidentally s
>
> On 2/15/2012 7:08 PM, email builder wrote:
>> OK, but: Q: Are there any default rules as supplied by sa-update that would
>> prevent SPF rules from firing?
> Not that I can think of.
>>
>> Q: Any other ideas on how to learn what rules are actually being
>
>>> Q: Will some rules not fire if some condition exists based on other
>>> rules?
>>>
>>> A: Correct. There are plenty of rules that build on other rules. We
>>> call these
>>> meta rules.
>>
>> Q: Are there any default rules as supplied by sa-update that would
>> prevent SPF rules fr
>
> Q: Will some rules not fire if some condition exists based on other rules?
>
> A: Correct. There are plenty of rules that build on other rules. We call
> these
> meta rules.
>
OK, but:
Q: Are there any default rules as supplied by sa-update that would
prevent SPF rules from firing?
>>> On 02/10, email builder wrote:
>>>> > I believe for SPF you *should* be doing the detecting at your
>>>> > MTA
>>>> > (mail server software) and inserting a header for
>>>> > spamassassin to use:
>>>>
> On 02/10, email builder wrote:
>> > I believe for SPF you *should* be doing the detecting at your MTA
>> > (mail server software) and inserting a header for spamassassin to use:
>> > Received-SPF. (Because SPF is supposed to use the "envelope
>>
> On 2/10/2012 9:20 PM, email builder wrote:
>> Wonder if I can delete the older one
> Sure. Worst case just run sa-update again if you delete the wrong one.
OK, thank you. I'll report back if it causes any problems but I can't imagine
it would.
>> Hm, well is
> On 2/10/2012 9:35 PM, email builder wrote:
>> Hi Kevin, thank you for your reply! But I think you should send it to the
>> list :)
> Hi & Thanks for bringing it back to the list. Sometimes I'm just trying
> to bang out answers too quickly!
>>> Y
> From: Kevin A. McGrail
Hi Kevin, thank you for your reply! But I think you should send it to the list
:)
>> Is this the right place to look to know what
>> tests the server should be running?
>>
>> https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html
> You should look in /var/lib/spamassass
Thanks a lot for your reply
> Run: sa-update -D 2>&1| grep DIR
>
> That will output something like:
>
> Feb 9 12:08:49.609 [20855] dbg: generic: Perl 5.010001, PREFIX=/usr,
> DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin, LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/spamassassin,
> LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib/spamassassin
>
Hello,
I have a server where I never customized any of the SA
rules/tests (SA v.3.3.1). The server does run sa-update
every day. Is this the right place to look to know what
tests the server should be running?
https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html
From that page, it seems that SPF
> After some help on the CentOS list, I may have found the problem:
>
>> perl-NetAddr-IP-4.044-1.el5.rf <=== I think that is the problem package
>>
>> I don't know if that version is required by the repoforge packages ...
>> but base contains perl-NetAddr-IP-4.027-5.el5_6
>>
>> I would se
>>> used 'it' for YEARS in production, (commercial product,)
>>> several
>>> platforms, i386, amd64, FreeBSD versions 6.4-7.4.
>>>
>>> ONE DAY, ONE BRAND NEW CLIENT was having real problems with their
>>> mailq. email was backing up.
>>> Two days to figure it out, I deleted the INET6
rpm -e --nodeps perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>> By the way, is there a way to grep for the errant code? My
>>> feeble attempt didn't turn up much:
>>>
>> as in one of my previous emails:
>>
>> 'locate IO-Socket-INET6'
Sorry I missed that!
This gives only docs:
/usr/share/doc/perl-IO-Sock
>> I am the ports maintainer for the FreeBSD version of SpamAssassin.
>>
>> used 'it' for YEARS in production, (commercial product,) several
>> platforms, i386, amd64, FreeBSD versions 6.4-7.4.
>>
>> ONE DAY, ONE BRAND NEW CLIENT was having real problems with their mailq.
> email
>> wa
>> while I*DO* appreciate your suggestion, since I am fairly confident to say
>> I doubt that my config is the problem in a DNS resolver/IPv6 function
>> redefinition, I'm not too interested in proving that point by making
>> those
>> changes on a production machine. Again, thanks anyway.
Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed
updated
version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is
indeed the
case.
>>>
>>> RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
>>> feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug) be
>> Sure, but the point is that my spamassassin and per-Net-DNS (where the
>> error is happening?) are up to date from the CentOS repo so shouldn't
>> they work without an error when spamassassin restarts?
>
> It isn't the job of the SA project to worry about specific distros and
> repos
>>> Does spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i Resolver show the
>>> same error?
>>
>> Yes
>
> And if you temporarily move all your config files and run the same command,
> does
> the error go away?
Yikes, I'm reluctant to do this on a production machine. I have
only made config changes in
>> Wow, really? Then why wouldn't RedHat or CentOS have a fixed updated
>> version in their repo? That seems egregious if what you say is indeed the
>> case.
>
> RedHat (and CentOS, since their whole mission is to match RHEL
> feature-for-feature and bug-for-bug) believes that their Enterprise
>>> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6
> and are you
>>
>>> 64-bit?
>>
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>
>
> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
> and the latest rpmforge package i
>> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
>>
>> line 66 [ OK ]
>>
>> With my spamassassin, perl-Net-DNS and per-IO-Socket-INET6
>> packages all being from CentOS repo, I'm unsure why this would hap
> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>>
>
> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
>>> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>>
>>>
What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you
> 64-bit?
>>>
>>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>>
>>
>> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses
> perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
>> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>>
>> If you're going
>>> What is the Net::DNS version, are you pure ipv6 and are you 64-bit?
>>
>>
>> perl-Net-DNS-0.63-1.el5.rf
>>
>
> You are in no man's land there - the distro uses perl-Net-DNS-0.59-3.el5
> and the latest rpmforge package is perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx.
>
> If you're going to use rpmforge
What does the following show:
>>
rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>>
>>> Oops, I meant:
>>>
>>> rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>
>> no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>
> Try rpm -q --whatrequires 'perl(IO::Socket::INET6)' - Perl depend
>> What does the following show:
>>
>> rpm -q --requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
>>
>
> Oops, I meant:
>
> rpm -q --whatrequires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
no package requires perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Woa wait a minute! Then why this???
yum remove perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
S
> I have spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5 installed from rpmforge on el5 - that
> package,
> besides being more up to date than the distro version also does not require
> perl-IO-Socket-INET6. I suspect your version does not really require
> perl-IO-Socket-INET6 either.
You may be right. It was sugg
would likely update net dns with cpan at least temporarily
>to see if it fixes thinks.
>Regards,
>KAM
>
>
>email builder wrote:
>Anyone have any other insights? Thanks!
>>
>>
>>>>> Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
Anyone have any other insights? Thanks!
>>> Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
>
>>>
>>> I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
>>> remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
>>> happening again:
>>>
>>> Subro
>> Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
>>
>> I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
>> remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
>> happening again:
>>
>> Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
>>
Hi,
Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum
I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don't
remember how, but I think just by upgrading), but now it's
happening again:
Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Expo
Hi,
Been a while since I had to look at our mail system (a tribute to
postfix/courier/spamassassin/sasl/related software), but when upgrading all our
software recently, I ran into a couple issues, the 2nd one being particularly
confounding (and not much turns up via a Google search, thus I thou
bump
--- Michael Monnerie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My users are quite happy
> > with overall markup of the spam. We occasionally get a HAM marked as
> > SPAM. We have an odd client base though.
>
> The question is: when to use global and when per-user bayes?
>
> On our server, we have p
> > Just a follow-up to my own brain-lapse:
> >
> > If you define a custom user scores query like this:
> >
> > user_scores_sql_custom_querySELECT preference, value FROM
> > spamassassin_settings WHERE username = _USERNAME_ OR username = '!GLOBAL'
> OR
> > username = CONCAT('@', _DOMAIN_) ORD
> > Well, I know there have to be some admins out there who have a lot of
> users
> > and do not use sitewide bayes.. RIGHT? See original email snippet at
> > bottom.
>
>
>
> > * Other ideas:
> > - increase system memory as much as possible
> > - per-domain Bayes instead of per-use
--- email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > When we connect to our bayes/awl/user_scores databases, the
> > connections
> > > are
> > > > being made by clients with unqualified hostnames. If we try to use
> > > GRANTs
> >
> > > When we connect to our bayes/awl/user_scores databases, the
> connections
> > are
> > > being made by clients with unqualified hostnames. If we try to use
> > GRANTs
> > > such as 'user'@'%.example.com', connections are refused since only the
> > > hostname portion is being used to connect
> > When we connect to our bayes/awl/user_scores databases, the connections
> are
> > being made by clients with unqualified hostnames. If we try to use
> GRANTs
> > such as 'user'@'%.example.com', connections are refused since only the
> > hostname portion is being used to connect I guess. For
Thanks a lot for checking, Gary!
--- "Gary W. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, my guy gave me the size of bayes + awl. The real number
> is 14.5mb. (with an overhead of 3.2mb).
>
>
> Not sure, that's just what phpmyadmin is reporting. I'll check again.
> I can't remember if
Hello,
When we connect to our bayes/awl/user_scores databases, the connections are
being made by clients with unqualified hostnames. If we try to use GRANTs
such as 'user'@'%.example.com', connections are refused since only the
hostname portion is being used to connect I guess. For example, if
> >
> > I guess the relevant point for this thread is that I don't necessarily
> think
> > that this is the silver bullet as implied. Even if you use a
> > high-availability clustering technology that can mirror writes and reads,
> you
> > are STILL dealing with the possibility of a database that
>> > Our production database for a large number of emails (but using site
>> > wide) is about 40mb.
>>
>> What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it has
>> been
>> enough to effectively capture your various user email habits?
>
> Default.
>
How can you be running the
> Our production database for a large number of emails (but using site
> wide) is about 40mb.
What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it has been
enough to effectively capture your various user email habits?
__
Start you
> > In-memory storage:
> > All data stored in each data node is kept in memory on the node's
> > host computer. For each data node in the cluster, you must have
> > available an amount of RAM equal to the size of the database times
> > the number of replicas,
>
> This refers to the first line: "I
> Just my $0.02 but if it's in MySQL then you really don't need to expire
> each one. You can write a custom script that will do this. When you
> break it down, expire is really just finding those tokens that are
> beyond the threshold where id=x and time=y. The resultant would be
> "where time=
> Well, I know there have to be some admins out there who have a lot of users
> and do not use sitewide bayes.. RIGHT? See original email snippet at
> bottom.
> * Other ideas:
> - increase system memory as much as possible
> - per-domain Bayes instead of per-user???
This might be o
Well, I know there have to be some admins out there who have a lot of users
and do not use sitewide bayes.. RIGHT? See original email snippet at
bottom.
I'll start the ball rolling with what few tweaks we've made, although they
are not enough; we desperately need more ideas to make this viabl
> >>> As a result of this, however, we are currently burdened with an
> >>> 8GB(! yep, you read it right) bayes database (more than 20K users
> >>> having mail delivered).
> >>
> >> Consider using bayes_expiry_max_db_size in conjunction with
> >> bayes_auto_expire
> >
> > "Using"? So you are s
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> email builder wrote:
> > As a result of this, however, we are currently burdened with an
> > 8GB(! yep, you read it right) bayes database (more than 20K users
> > having mail delivered).
>
> Consider using bayes_expiry_max_
Hi all,
I'm wondering if anyone out there hosts a large number of users with
per-USER bayes (in MySQL)? Our user base is varied enough that we do not
feel bayes would be effective if done site-wide. Some people like their
spammy newsletters, some are geeks who would deeply resent someone train
--- email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But again, since almost no legitimate email is ever
> > greylisted only almost nothing DESIRABLE EVER gets
> > delayed.
>
> So you ONLY greylist what the RBLs tell you is on their list? Maybe I need
> to
> But again, since almost no legitimate email is ever
> greylisted only almost nothing DESIRABLE EVER gets
> delayed.
So you ONLY greylist what the RBLs tell you is on their list? Maybe I need
to go back and re-read your original email, which I skimmed perhaps too
lightly... because even back
--- Herb Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am new to postfix and spamassassin, but we are already
> > using greylist, and I liked a lot what you said here.
> >
> > How can I greylist messages by means of RBL checking? How
> > should I setup Postfix to do that?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Carl
> On Donnerstag, 22. September 2005 22:24 email builder wrote:
> > How so? I can't believe you don't hear me when I say for the 100th
> > time that services like ours that have a lot of users who expect to
> > communicate with hotmail users cannot use an RBL in
> goals as irrelevant as you explicitly did. I, for one, enjoy the thought
> of
> people working together for goals outside of their own self-interest.
>
>
> So we circle back to the start: you apparently have a utopian user
> community
> that does not have any need to correspond with hotmail us
> ... but who not to whitelist?
> >>>
> >>> the small guys. unfortunately, large ISPs like that have power in
> >>> the
> >>> number
> >>> of users they have. in no way do I advocate defending that as a good
> >>> thing,
> >>> but the fact that this gives them an immense amount of power to
> We removed sorbs. I don't think it's even open for debate at the
> current
> point.
> If places like hotmail mx's end up on the blacklist you *will*
> have
> upset
> customers.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah. It would be nice if there were a blacklist out there that took
> >> We removed sorbs. I don't think it's even open for debate at the
> >> current
> >> point.
> >> If places like hotmail mx's end up on the blacklist you *will* have
> >> upset
> >> customers.
> >
> > Yeah. It would be nice if there were a blacklist out there that took
> > the
> > best of
> > Complaint from a user led me to find this in our logfile:
> >
> > Sep 21 09:07:07 gaia postfix/smtpd[6392]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > bay101-f11.bay101.hotmail.com[64.4.56.21]: 554 Service unavailable;
> Client
> > host [64.4.56.21] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received See:
> > ht
> > Sep 21 09:07:07 gaia postfix/smtpd[6392]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > bay101-f11.bay101.hotmail.com[64.4.56.21]: 554 Service unavailable;
> Client
> > host [64.4.56.21] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received See:
> > http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?64.4.56.21; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Complaint from a user led me to find this in our logfile:
Sep 21 09:07:07 gaia postfix/smtpd[6392]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
bay101-f11.bay101.hotmail.com[64.4.56.21]: 554 Service unavailable; Client
host [64.4.56.21] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.
Hello,
We just migrated to Tinydns from BIND and are looking at our cache size
(OK, so I am really talking about dnscache, not tinydns itself). Looking at
our cache logs from the last 12 hours (2am Friday night to 2pm Saturday
afternoon), I see our "cache motion" is already 75MB of data. Wow.
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
> Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of
> getting
> an updated release schedule (I checked the wiki, but the schedule info for
> 3.1.0 seems out of date)?
>
> Might also be nice to see some pointer
> > > Telnet uses the built-in resolver -- most ordinary
> > applications work
> > > this way.
> >
> > Hrm. Any tips on how to make it aware of my new "spam." subdomain?
>
> If a application uses a resolver (it's own or the built
> in resovler) that points solely to a DNS server (set)
> WITH
> > > You cannot depend on "first DNS" setting on a client -- most DNS
> > > clients may try ANY of the one's listed -- Windows clients for
> > > instance certainly work this way.
> >
> > OK, fair enough (although from my experience, dig always
> > seems to take the first one it finds that work
> > I recognize this is a bit OT, but not sure where to turn...?
> >
> > I am trying to use DNS to load balance a couple spamd
> > servers. I am attempting to return more than one A record
> > for spam.mydomain.com, and I am getting a correct dig, but
> > just a test telnet is returning "U
qYEtK+MMxJUkTh49JFhGn0NEWiKgHcDmqS06AYxSsU3U+itOkbDn+2aLfIkMKzRdoPfAztHWnEMdiIQ=
> ;
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from [64.171.185.165] by web51909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed,
> 17 Aug 2005 16:16:02 PDT
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
> F
All,
I recognize this is a bit OT, but not sure where to turn...?
I am trying to use DNS to load balance a couple spamd servers. I am
attempting to return more than one A record for spam.mydomain.com, and I am
getting a correct dig, but just a test telnet is returning "Unknown host".
What
--- Herb Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm no DNS expert, so am wondering if I am shooting myself
> > in the foot by having "forwarders" set up in my BIND config
> > file, especially with "forward
> > first":
>
> > Where xxx and yyy are the DNS servers for my colo provider
>
Hello,
I'm no DNS expert, so am wondering if I am shooting myself in the foot by
having "forwarders" set up in my BIND config file, especially with "forward
first":
options {
directory "/var/named";
forward first;
forwarders {
xxx.xxx.x.x
Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of getting
an updated release schedule (I checked the wiki, but the schedule info for
3.1.0 seems out of date)?
Might also be nice to see some pointers in the docs about how to reenable the
DCC and Razor plugins for those of us who
> SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc1 is released! SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a major update.
Very exciting!
> - - Apache preforking algorithm adopted; number of spamd child processes is
> now
> scaled, according to demand. This provides better VM behaviour when not
> under peak load.
I presume this is acti
Bump. :) Gary, please share how you do this! Thanks!
> > > How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
> > > (make
> > > and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
> > > these
> > > details!
> >
> > We just call them in order case on the c
> >> Don't expire things manually.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > 1. Why not?
> >
> > 2. On a Bayes SQL setup with multiple servers feeding/reading the db,
> > should one server be responsible for expiration or should each
> > opportunistically take care of it?
> >
> >
> I'll be more specific, don't expire thin
> >
> > How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
> > (make
> > and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
> > these
> > details!
>
> We just call them in order case on the connection line. On two of the 4
> SMTP gateways we use node 1 as
out
there or a combination of several??
Do you run DCC in your SA environment? If so, you are over their recommended
limit for hosting a DCC server (we are nearing it - 100K a day I think). Do
you run a DCC server for yourself? Any issues to be aware of?
Thanks a TON!!
>
> >
--- Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, email builder wrote:
>
> > Technically, this should be feasible with just plain DNS load balancing,
> but
> > in our current medium/low budget scenario, we don't have the rackspace to
--- Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/05, email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even if I had forgotten the -A, I think I would have been seeing
> connection
> > refused notices, but right now, it just seems to time out. I'm pretty
>
would have been seeing connection
refused notices, but right now, it just seems to time out. I'm pretty sure
this is a LVS question more than a spamc/d question, since I've no problems
with the latter -- I am only asking here to see if anyone else does SA
weighted load balancing.
Hi,
I am looking for advice on how to load balance spamd servers. I (think I)
understand that the -d option used with -H for spamc will randomize multiple
addresses from a DNS lookup of the given hostname (and still include failover
support???).
However, I am wanting to do weighted load bala
newest (0.53) and the problem has gone away.
Thanks everyone!
email builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a new spamd instance I am trying to start up on a server that sitsbehind another firewall (linux) machine (which I *think* is irrelevant, butthat's the only different thing fro
I have a new spamd instance I am trying to start up on a server that sits
behind another firewall (linux) machine (which I *think* is irrelevant, but
that's the only different thing from our other setups that work fine) that is
somehow missing DNS connections:
'
Hi,
We recently changed some of our network topology so that we are temporarily
connecting with spamc to spamd over a regular external network connection (we
usually keep it inside our LAN, but this is a temporary thing... don't ask).
Unfortunately, spamd stops (mostly) responding it seems.
All,
I also ran into this problem:
> 0.51 has already been released that addresses the overlooked debug
> statement (http://www.net-dns.org/).I still get failures in
> the "11-escapedchars.t" test under Solaris-8/Perl-5.8.6 though.
I contacted the author and he said it's fixed in SVN:
"I f
> > in several posts I have noticed people refer to a "caching nameserver".
> > What exactly is that? Would BIND 9.3.1 qualify? Any advice would be
> > greatly appreciated.
> yes Bind will become a caching only name server if you don;t have any
> local zone files to lookup. Basically think of i
> >>> Some postings a while back led me to believe that I could specify
> >>> multiple hosts for the -d option of spamc. I understood that it
> >>> would operate basically on a fallback basis (not load balancing).
> >>> However, I can't seem to get spamc to use more than one of the -d
> >>> listin
> > Some postings a while back led me to believe that I could specify
> multiple
> > hosts for the -d option of spamc. I understood that it would operate
> > basically on a fallback basis (not load balancing). However, I can't
> seem to
> > get spamc to use more than one of the -d listings. I'
All,
Some postings a while back led me to believe that I could specify multiple
hosts for the -d option of spamc. I understood that it would operate
basically on a fallback basis (not load balancing). However, I can't seem to
get spamc to use more than one of the -d listings. I've tried:
/us
Hi,
I have a global setting in my SQL-based userprefs for use_auto_whitelist.
I am noticing that spamd -D shows these messages about it, which confuse me:
debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from SQL server
debug: config: not parsing, administrator setting: use_auto_whitelist 1
deb
> > I'm looking for how to tell sa-learn to learn against a per-user Bayes
> > database (in MySQL) instead of learning sitewide.
> >
> As in manually training the database?
>
> sa-learn -u username
Can anyone tell me how to verify that a message was learnt correctly for the
right user? Runni
> > I'm looking for how to tell sa-learn to learn against a per-user Bayes
> > database (in MySQL) instead of learning sitewide.
> >
> As in manually training the database?
>
> sa-learn -u username
I don't know... as long as this will do the same thing spamd does with the
username to work agai
Hi,
I'm looking for how to tell sa-learn to learn against a per-user Bayes
database (in MySQL) instead of learning sitewide.
I swear I saw this was going to be in 3.0.2; some kind of change to
sa-learn... but a couple hours searching around didn't turn up anything
helpful. If I missed someth
All,
> email builder wrote:
> >
> > >How much email are you processing ?
> >
> > Well, just the other day we had an average of 48 msgs/min (max 255/min)
> > get run through SA. Can't say today yet because can't run our stats
> > tools unt
> > I am attempting to offload SA to a machine that is not my main MX
> server.
> > I have two machines, two NIC cards and a crossover cable, but after that
> I
> > get very lost. I believe there should be a way to make them aware of one
> > another using this direct connection w/out the need fo
Hello,
I am attempting to offload SA to a machine that is not my main MX server.
I have two machines, two NIC cards and a crossover cable, but after that I
get very lost. I believe there should be a way to make them aware of one
another using this direct connection w/out the need for DHCP or a
> a question that Google nor any list I can find will answer... trying to
> install perl module Net::Ident, I get make test errors as follows. I'd
> really appreciate any tips. I've no idea why this is happening (Fedora
> Core 1):
>
> # perl -MCPAN -e'CPAN::Shell->install("Net::Ident")'
>
All,
I understand this may be the wrong place to ask a perl question, but I have
a question that Google nor any list I can find will answer... trying to
install perl module Net::Ident, I get make test errors as follows. I'd
really appreciate any tips. I've no idea why this is happening (Fedor
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
