t, and you
claim to be running SA in 1/16th that amount of RAM?
;)
jdow said:
> Redhat 9 does. It's rather slow. But it does get there. It's for two users
> only. But we're both in the 1000+ emails a day class users.
>
> {^_^}
> - Original Message -
> From: &
jdow said:
> I normally run SpamAssassin (2.63) on a slow machine, a
> 166MHz Pentium with only 256k of ram.
Pray tell, what OS enables you to run SA with only a quarter Meg of RAM?
einheit
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 3:35 PM -0700 einheit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those sorts of "honor-system viruses" for unix are quite common, but
hardly ever work, up to now, since they require someone with both root
access to a unix system, and a lack o
John Andersen wrote:
Instead of laughing at it, has anyone actually LOOKED at what
this would install on a redhat system?
Feel free - it's likely some rude hack to bypass tcp wrappers, and allow
ssh access from anywhere, or install some sort of innocuous-sounding
daemon which listens for passw
Pierre Thomson wrote:
SpamAssassin flagged this just now, and MailScanner removed it from the stream. The main hits were DCC and RBL related.
Good work, SA!
http://frodo.bruderhof.com/redhat.txt
Nice - SA detected bogosity in this message, though differently than a
human would (If I had gott
J Thomas Hancock said:
> We want our users to set their own custom delete levels and marking
> levels.
> The best way I have found for us to store those settings is using SA's
> MySQL
> capabilities. I looked at MailScanner, amavisd-new, and now Mimedefang.
> I
> could not see where those utilit
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions wrote:
Andy Norris wrote:
Hi,
While attempting to install 3.0 via MCPAN, everything seemed to go
okay until:
Makefile:54: *** missing separator. Stop.
/usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
Running make test
Can't test without successful make
Running make install
Andy Norris wrote:
Hi,
While attempting to install 3.0 via MCPAN, everything seemed to go
okay until:
Makefile:54: *** missing separator. Stop.
/usr/bin/make -- NOT OK
Running make test
Can't test without successful make
Running make install
make had returned bad status, install seems impo
I have knowledge of a large automotive manufacturer who has been using
spamassassin on a test group of 700 users or so, and is now planning to
extend the program to 12,000 users - nowhere near 100,000 users though,
so I wasn't sure whether I should waste your time with this...
e
Daniel Quinlan
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:40:35PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
Can someone possible assist? This is on Redhat 9. I'm desperate to get Bayes
functioning.
Doesn't RH 9 have a perl-DB_File RPM?
Indeed it does, Max need only grab his install CDs -
Or, better yet, install
10 matches
Mail list logo
