RE: Performance problem after upgrading from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2

2007-08-10 Thread donald.dawson
I'm posting a correction to my earlier post: When I installed SA 3.2.2 from the package from spamassassin.org, it did not add any plugins or uncomment any plugins. On this one MX box I used the tarball from the mailscanner.info site that had clamav and spamassassin 3.2.2 - I'm wondering if that p

RE: FW: Performance problem after upgrading from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2

2007-08-09 Thread donald.dawson
Thanks - I understand. I was just showing the section of the *.pre file that showed the plugin. -Original Message- From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 8:43 PM To: Dawson, Donald Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: Performance prob

FW: Performance problem after upgrading from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2

2007-08-09 Thread donald.dawson
> I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+ > seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2. > > It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out > the plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several > plugins automatic

Performance problem after upgrading from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2

2007-08-09 Thread donald.dawson
I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+ seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2. It's the following plugin. I have tested loading and commenting out the plugin - it's the culprit. SA 3.2.2 automatically adds several plugins automatically. # ASN

RE: score-0 problem: SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 5, autolearn=)

2007-07-25 Thread donald.dawson
No rules triggered at all for that piece of spam. I'll check the MailScanner group to see if they have any experience with this issue. Thanks, Donald -Original Message- From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:18 PM To: Dawson, Donald; users@spamassassin.apach

RE: score-0 problem: SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 5, autolearn=)

2007-07-25 Thread donald.dawson
sm - We have the same configuration on all our MX servers. Here are all of the headers for an example spam email: Note, it may be system/config-related - the /dev/shm directory is used by spamassassin, but it is not getting cleaned out consistently. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0

RE: score-0 problem: SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 5, autolearn=)

2007-07-25 Thread donald.dawson
There are files in /dev/shm/ (.spamassassin*) that are being created, and some are being left in that directory. Here is an example of a file that has been left on this ramdisk fs: # grep l6PJ1iYV029369 /var/log/maillog Jul 25 14:01:51 houmx05 milter-greylist: l6PJ1iYV029369: skipping greylist b

score-0 problem: SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 5, autolearn=)

2007-07-25 Thread donald.dawson
I have noticed that some spam has been creeping in. We have 4 inbound MX servers, but only has is experiencing this problem. SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 running on Perl version 5.8.3 This is MailScanner version 4.59.4 Here are the counts of 'is not spam' and 'is spam' with 'score=0,': fgrep "sco

How to get Spam report in header?

2007-07-17 Thread donald.dawson
We use MailScanner and Spamassassin. Our email has a header line as follows: X-BakerBotts-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.4, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -0.40, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -4.00) Is it possible to include the 'S

RE: isolated W

2007-07-05 Thread donald.dawson
Martin, How did you run the test below and get the rules grid? Did you somehow test the email contents below? I'm concerned my implementation did not return these hits. Thanks, Donald -Original Message- From: Martin.Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:5

FW: isolated W

2007-07-05 Thread donald.dawson
This may have already been addressed, but is there a released rule set or add-on that would help in identifying these type of stock spam emails? We use MailScanner 4.59.4 (MailScanner-v: 3.002000 Mail::SpamAssassin), SpamAssassin 3.2 (SpamAssassin -V), Perl 5.8.5, DCC, Pyzor. We run sa-update and

RE: 70_sare_header.cf dupe

2005-05-27 Thread Donald.Dawson
I sent an email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' about those the first two (VIRUS_WARN...) -Original Message- From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 12:47 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: 70_sare_header.cf dupe 70_sare_header.cf dupe- Original

70_sare_header.cf dupe

2005-05-27 Thread Donald.Dawson
Title: 70_sare_header.cf dupe Checking for duplicate rules using the following command, cat *.cf | awk '/^score/ {print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | awk '{if ($1 > 1) print $0}' | more I found the following duplicate: # grep -n SARE_MSGID_LONG50 * | grep score 70_sare_header.cf:9