On 2016.09.23 16.16, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:43 +0100, RW wrote:
Right, but the question here is why isn't a forwarding server also a
recursive server? Why is the use of iteration the defining feature of
a recursive server and not the support for recursion.
http://serve
On 2016.09.23 12.03, RW wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
Lists shouldn't have said "caching", that confuses the issue. Caching
and recursion are two different, unrelated pieces.
Focus on the "recursion" and "no forwarding" parts of that
recommendation.
I've
are spf records allowed to be a cname? e.g.:
http://dpaste.com/0MR0R3C.txt
is this explicitly addressed in an rfc?
thanks
-ben
i was excited to see a link to
https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin/+archive/ubuntu/spamassassin-daily
on https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DownloadFromSvn
but it appears to be defunct. should this be current? or has it been
abandoned? is it missing a curator?
just curious
thanks
-ben
hi-
i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to
spamassassin. after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't
cleaning up after itself?
>ls -alH /tmp/
total 44
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 36864 Feb 3 17:18 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Dec 25 00:34 ..
>sa-compile --
On 2014.12.16 07.10, Axb wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/sare/files/
thanks for this. it's particularly timely for us, as we've just
recently been pretty badly phished.
is there a method which can be used to measure/report on the efficacy of
these particular rules?
-ben
On 2014.12.12 12.55, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, btb wrote:
is the description for FROM_MISSP_SPF_FAIL absent on purpose? i know
it's not anything that matters in terms of spamassassin working
properly, but it's always nice to have descriptions, and of course
helps avoid
i see a handful of messages when testing with spamassassin --debug
--lint 2>&1 | egrep -i '(define|fail)' that i'm wondering about:
http://dpaste.com/25PPE0Z.txt
is the description for FROM_MISSP_SPF_FAIL absent on purpose? i know
it's not anything that matters in terms of spamassassin workin
On 2014.12.09 06.46, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Dec 08, 2014, at 19.28, Mark Martinec
wrote:
Actually, looking at a diff of DBM.pm between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1
I can see the taint bug has already been fixed by r1608413:
@@ -814,3 +816,3 @@
my @vars = $self->get_storage_variables();
- dbg("bayes: DB
On 2014.12.08 13.44, Mark Martinec wrote:
Ben wrote:
On 2014.12.08 10.13, Mark Martinec wrote:
btb wrote:
i hope it's not too soon to ask about this again. i'm not quite sure
how to debug something like this when when it's --debug that is what
behaves differently :) i'
On 2014.12.08 10.13, Mark Martinec wrote:
btb wrote:
i hope it's not too soon to ask about this again. i'm not quite sure
how to debug something like this when when it's --debug that is what
behaves differently :) i've put the commands and output into a
pastebin this time
i hope it's not too soon to ask about this again. i'm not quite sure
how to debug something like this when when it's --debug that is what
behaves differently :) i've put the commands and output into a pastebin
this time.
On 2014.12.03 05.45, Mark Martinec wrote:
listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.
On 2014.12.03 05.45, Mark Martinec wrote:
> listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote:
>> i was testing with a sample message, and noticed that when running
>> manually with --debug, there seem to be numerous differences in the
>> results, such as scores for the same tests differing, visual ordering
>>
On 2014.11.04 11.37, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I didn't look at the emails but most of these appear to be reactive
> network-based tests like RBL and Razor/Pyzor. It would make complete
> sense that it might slip by and then be caught in the future.
On 2014.11.04 12.00, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Sinc
hello-
i've noticed lately a trend in which two messages which appear to be
identical arrive a few minutes apart, and one is marked as spam while
the other is not. aside from time stamps, queue ids, etc, i believe the
headers and content of the two messages to be identical. i can see
obviou
hi-
we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
[containing the selected message] which is ultimately delivered to a
mailbox. i intend on retrieving these messages via imap and feeding
sa-learn
16 matches
Mail list logo
