Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all"

ses SPF." > > right, or better, this domain is using spf only for having it, means nothing ... IMO any of this spf politic options + ? ~ are making the SPF record worthless but I think the -all option should be considered as valid, because at least the sys-admin gives instruction

Re: why don't banks do more against phishing?

Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:25 +0100, RW wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:20:13 -0300 >> xTrade Assessory wrote: >> >> >>> no serious bank, as any other serious company, would ever send out >>> emails asking for user deta

Re: why don't banks do more against phishing?

a stolen car ... if you target a culprit you should go after all this irresponsible webhosting companies which do not review the content and web admins who do not have a clew about what they are doing Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: Slip thu's

end it out ... IMO when the domain and sender exist, not as known spammer or OR, you should not do that and better hang on to content analysis for evaluation/scoring Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: New versions of Perl are slower

to 15 seconds even on the most busiest machines, most are not going beyond 5, since numbers are better, I have 17msgs over 15 seconds but not passing 16.5 from 32400 processed msgs, daily average for last week for one of my midsize server I do not see any difference between machines with pe

Re: New versions of Perl are slower

Even doing so, I don't now if such a test or any mathematically average scan time can say something at all about perl performance IMO, if you really have scan times over 20 seconds (as you query your log for) you may have other problems, not perl related problems but as always, only my opini

Re: sa-update

t; activate the changes. > I would say you nned to run sa-update, then sa-compile and then restart spamd ... and check the log if it comes up clean Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: SPF_FAIL

nfigures SPF with ~all is showing the bird to all ... so I take "the bird action" also on my servers if all would do so, SPF would be taken much more serious by the ~admins and life could be a little better :) Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: A flood of new domains ?

ation as fast as possible in order to get still to the endpoint Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: A flood of new domains ?

t this problem is probably not relevant for europe Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: was: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham is:simplify training of misclassified emails

verhead for spamd and it is practical, easy and cheap, the result is, before I got on certain accounts 50 SPAMS per day, now 2 maybe 3 and that numbers are for mservers with each of them having +50.000 accounts going through Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: does bayes_auto_learn expire bayes

y start using sa-learn, but IMO there are a lot of other interesting things you should dominate first before hacking bayes and also, of course sending a real pizza over here :) cheers Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: Σχετ: Mark message as spam from Postfix Queue

Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 3/8/2012 5:19 AM, xTrade Assessory wrote: >> Tom Kinghorn wrote: >>> You can then grep through the spam files and search for a common >>> string, eg score. >>> >>> e.g >>> # cd /amavis/virusmails >>> # >&g

Re: Σχετ: Mark message as spam from Postfix Queue

quot;spam" | grep "Mar 8" | awk '{print $9}' | xargs > zgrep -i "score=" > > wow 5 processes for each step ... that eventually gets your machine real busy ... at least join all this greps into one grep -e pattern -e pattern or egrep "pattern1|pattern

Re: dccifd error

LuKreme wrote: > On Mar 4, 2012, at 21:34, xTrade Assessory wrote: > >> you can disable the plugin or setup use_dcc 0 in local.cf > The plugin *was* disabled in v310, but the errors still showed up in the > maillog, which is what started this. As far as I can see, dcc was never

Re: dccifd error

LuKreme wrote: > On 04 Mar 2012, at 05:38 , xTrade Assessory wrote: > >> not sure but probably the dccifd is the remote daemon and since DCC is a >> commerial service you might not have a account there, so you cannot >> connect ... ? > <http://www.rhyolite.com/d

Re: dccifd error

ght not have a account there, so you cannot connect ... ? Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br

Re: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham

LuKreme wrote: > On 04 Mar 2012, at 03:55 , xTrade Assessory wrote: > >> what do you think of something less complex? > Yeah, I went with Junk/NotJunk, anything placed in Junk gets trained as spam, > anything in NotJunk trained as ham. What I’d like to do though is move the &

Re: Allowing IMAP users to train spam/ham

few times with > the virtual users, but I ended up with a process that ground the computer to > a halt and generated a bayes database that was massively large (GBs). > > So, other than throwing more iron at the problem, is there something I can do > to make this process a little

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-03-03 18:59, xTrade Assessory skrev: > >> not quite ... your domain has no A record > > dig ANY www.tamay-dogan.net a > dig ANY www.tamay-dogan.net > > both works here > first BS is querying the www record second, BS is bo

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-03-03 19:25, xTrade Assessory skrev: > >> the A record for a domain is the fall back for MTAs if no MX is >> available > > what mta do try this ? any > , what rfc says there must be a A for every hostname pr MX ? firstable what you w

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello xTrade Assessory, > > Am 2012-03-03 14:59:16, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> not quite ... your domain has no A record > Ehm: > > tamay-dogan.net. 3600IN MX 10 mail.tamay-dogan.net. > mail.tamay-dogan.net. 3600I

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello xTrade Assessory, > > Am 2012-03-01 16:27:41, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> your domain has no A Record > --[ command 'dig ANY tamay-dogan.net' ]- > ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode. > tamay-d

Re: Spamassassin detect my mails as spam

A Record even if it has an MX the missing A Record may be a cause of msgs being rejected on certain mailservers, most probably after HELO before any antispam hooks in, but if it goes through, it might be possible that there are antispams (custom or not) looking for the domain A Record as well

T_DKIM_INVALID + missing SPF_PASS

mtp.mfrom=a...@yyy.com.br X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD #### -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249. http://xtrade.matik.com.br