Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?

2004-09-23 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Sandy S whispered: > Apparently the lookups timed out. I assume that's something to do with the > fact that it's checking for tvuu.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info instead of just > wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info, but I don't know enough about how the URI RBLs > work t

Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?

2004-09-23 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Sandy S whispered: > Ulysses - > Thanks for your advice. I'm pretty sure we have all the needed perl > modules, since 99% of the time the URIBL rules are working just as they're > supposed to. It's only on those one or two .info domains that they don't >

Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?

2004-09-23 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Sandy S. whispered: > Thanks for your response - that's very interesting! We're running > Spamassassin 3.0 on FreeBSD 4.9, using spamd/spamc called via procmail. I > do have a bunch of custom rulesets, mostly pulled from the SARE site: > 70_sare_uri.cf, 9

Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?

2004-09-23 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Sandy S whispered: > I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am currently running > my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had an email slip > through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's listed > in

Re: Bayes Perms

2004-09-07 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:31:56AM -0400, JP whispered: > > Did you make sure that all your users have write permissions on the > > directory > > itself? Also it doesn't look like the 777 permissions were actually set on > > your > > The directory is set to 777. Do I have to remove/re-build the D

Re: using a global bayesian database?

2004-09-07 Thread Ulysses Cruz
OK, It looks like I forgot to mention that you also have to change the permissions on your global directory so that it is also world writable. -- Ulysses S. Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] "If it wasn't for the voices in my head, I'd go insane from loneliness"

Re: Bayes Perms

2004-09-06 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 12:24:28AM -0400, JP whispered: > /etc/mail/spamassassin> ls -l > total 1252 > -rw---1 vscanvscan 27827 2004-09-06 00:11 bayes_journal > -rw-rw-r--1 vscanusers 86016 2004-09-06 00:10 bayes_seen > -rw-rw-r--1 vscanusers 1314816 2004

Re: using a global bayesian database?

2004-09-06 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 09:54:43AM -0600, Lucas Albers whispered: > This depends on how SA is integrated with your mail server. > if all incoming mail is run under the same account, then you have a a > global database, if it runs under each user, with procmail for example > then you do not. Actual

Re: shifting the midpoint between the average spam and average ham

2004-09-03 Thread Ulysses Cruz
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:29:32AM -0400, Matt Kettler whispered: > SA's scores are assigned by a genetic algorithm that evolves out the best > scores for all the rules as one gigantic simultaneous equation. It tunes > this equation to get the most email correctly placed into the spam and ham >