I had a similar, less expensive thought; Checking the global color
table in the header of all of the gif images in a particular message. I
tested a couple of spam cases and the GCTs are identical in all of my
limited number of test cases.
Logan Shaw wrote:
> Looks like people have started to ge
Evan Platt wrote:
At 11:45 AM 10/21/2005, you wrote:
If you grouped the rulesets into +/- sets and processed all the -
rules first it wouldn't create false ly scored messages. Or would it ?
No, but you still would have to process all the rules regardless - I
mean a incorrectly whitelisted
jdow wrote:
From: "Chris L. Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Back in 2.64 There was the option to have SA stop going though rules
then it hit a max score.
Is there any option for this in 3.X.X ?
No. Such a rule actually costs processing time AND would create false
positives or false negatives
