X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains x.com

2024-07-16 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Hello, today a mail has been banned (false positive). It says message contains x.com X-Quarantine-ID: X-Amavis-Alert: BANNED, message contains x.com I couldnt find x.com in the mail body itself, but the mail had a zipfile as an attachment. The zip file probably contains invoices. Are the

Re: Where are your test definitions?

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Am 2024-06-14 21:20, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: grep -ri "FONT_INVIS_NORDNS" /var/lib/spamassassin/ | grep describe /var/lib/spamassassin/4.00/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf: describe FONT_INVIS_NORDNS Invisible text + no rDNS In my case, I can say with certainty that the mail

Re: Where are your test definitions?

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Am 2024-06-14 18:24, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: 1. as I said it's hard to find out without the body 2. hiding data indicates a spammer. Yes, I've now realized that I can simply grep for the descriptions. grep -ri "FONT_INVIS_NORDNS" /var/lib/spamassassin/ | grep describe /var/lib/spamassa

Re: Where are your test definitions?

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Am 2024-06-14 17:11, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: FONT_INVIS_NORDNS=1.544 HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS=1.514 RDNS_NONE=0.793 working fcrdns would fix much for them. However, not doing stupid shit with fonts would help even more: FONT_INVIS_MSGID=2.497 FONT_INVIS_NORDNS=1.544 HTML_FONT_TINY_NORDNS=1

Re: Where are your test definitions?

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Am 2024-06-14 16:44, schrieb Reindl Harald (privat): with RDNS_NONE nobody on this planet should accept mails from that machine and the admin has to be fired, the message should be jejected at SMTP level long before spamassassin And you would have been dismissed because of your pathological fa

Where are your test definitions?

2024-06-14 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Hello, I would like to explain a sender what he can do to create an email that is not classified as spam. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.248 tagged_above=1 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.001, FONT_INVIS_

Re: Score 0.001

2024-05-13 Thread Thomas Barth via users
Am 2024-05-13 04:33, schrieb jdow: Um, "FORGED_SPF_HELO"? Are you sure this message is from MS? {^_^} The mail/report is authentic. They already corrected this "error" or changed the sending server. In today's report FORGED_SPF_HELO is 0.001 and the score is below 5 :) On 20240512 06:56:5