AW: howto do re-scoring of rules with a custom channel?

2015-07-16 Thread Support SpamAssassin
make them being loaded after the regular SpamAssassin update files. (e.g. to "xsaInternalChannel") Best regards, Harald Binkle Von: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2015 11:27 An: Support SpamAssassin; users@spamassassin.apache.org Betreff: Re:

howto do re-scoring of rules with a custom channel?

2015-07-16 Thread Support SpamAssassin
Hi, We created our own internal channel to feed our SpamAssassin installations with some custom rules. Recently tried to re-score a SpamAssassin rule using the channel files, but it does not work. When the channel is updated it correctly downloads the "saInternalChannel_mydoamin_com.cf" containi

RE: A SpamAssassin Crash Course for Admins

2011-12-02 Thread Support SpamAssassin
Hi there, There isn't really much documentation for any Windows related topics since Michael Bell's tutorial site is offline as well as SpamAssassin for Win32 project being discontinued. However, while compiling an own version of native (so not Cygwin based) Windows SpamAssassin, I've written d

RE: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

2010-07-20 Thread Support SpamAssassin
age- > From: Support SpamAssassin [mailto:spamassas...@jam-software.com] > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:39 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Charles G

RE: [SpamAssassin] Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

2010-07-20 Thread Support SpamAssassin
From: Emin Akbulut [mailto:eminakbu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:54 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have different scores. Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info... ___

Re: First run score: 25.7 Second: 2.6

2010-07-16 Thread Support SpamAssassin
> -Original Message- > From: Charles Gregory > > Now if I have to GUESS on insufficient data, I would suspect that the 'port' > of > spamd to Windows(?) does not properly tidy up its children when finished. > The fact that it crashes certainly points in this direction. > May I presume that