works with my distro, great! Otherwise...
--
JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)
"Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"
Mike Burger wrote:
You have to keep in mind, though, that T-Mobile (and its predecessors,
Voicestream, etc) and Sprint never had analog service (although Sprint's
phones would work on Verizon's analog network).
Sprint most likely forced roamers to use analog because then they could say
"our digi
Michael W Cocke wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote:
months I had them. Verizon may be annoying, but at least I can use
their system.
Note that Verizon and Verizon Wireless seem to be separate companies. I got
They are indeed separate companies, and have been for at least a year
jdow wrote:
With the advent of the charge for using 411 the usage went way down
allowing them to economise by dropping most of their 411 people. The
"O" process got inconvenient enough that they were able to drop the
number of "O" people.
I live in the Victor Valley area of California.
Verizon has
Ron McKeating wrote:
I could understand if they really were 56k modem dialup ip addresses,
but this is a ntl cable modem, the linux server sits on it 24-7 and
matches the ip address against the dns entry for my domain every hour by
cron. If the ip address changes, then the dns gets updated. Lots of
David Brodbeck wrote:
make sure in writing before you sign anything that your ip(s) will
never be listed by the ISP as res/dynamic/dialup ip. If they do they
may be in breach of contract (and you would need a lawyer for
resolution.)
I doubt any ISP would agree to a contract term like that, beca
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Yes. Although Microsoft has refused to disclose what they have
actually applied for patents on, their license only applies to specific
parts of Sender-ID, which seems to imply that they did not apply for
patents on SPF itself. In any case, it is certainly seems safe