Re: rpm installation and dependencies

2005-07-10 Thread Steve Sobol
works with my distro, great! Otherwise... -- JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638) "Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"

Re: OT: Crippled Verizon phones

2005-01-23 Thread Steve Sobol
Mike Burger wrote: You have to keep in mind, though, that T-Mobile (and its predecessors, Voicestream, etc) and Sprint never had analog service (although Sprint's phones would work on Verizon's analog network). Sprint most likely forced roamers to use analog because then they could say "our digi

Re: OT: Crippled Verizon phones

2005-01-23 Thread Steve Sobol
Michael W Cocke wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote: months I had them. Verizon may be annoying, but at least I can use their system. Note that Verizon and Verizon Wireless seem to be separate companies. I got They are indeed separate companies, and have been for at least a year

Re: OT: Crippled Verizon phones

2005-01-23 Thread Steve Sobol
jdow wrote: With the advent of the charge for using 411 the usage went way down allowing them to economise by dropping most of their 411 people. The "O" process got inconvenient enough that they were able to drop the number of "O" people. I live in the Victor Valley area of California. Verizon has

Re: My IP listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Sobol
Ron McKeating wrote: I could understand if they really were 56k modem dialup ip addresses, but this is a ntl cable modem, the linux server sits on it 24-7 and matches the ip address against the dns entry for my domain every hour by cron. If the ip address changes, then the dns gets updated. Lots of

Re: reply from sorbs

2004-11-28 Thread Steve Sobol
David Brodbeck wrote: make sure in writing before you sign anything that your ip(s) will never be listed by the ISP as res/dynamic/dialup ip. If they do they may be in breach of contract (and you would need a lawyer for resolution.) I doubt any ISP would agree to a contract term like that, beca

Re: Apache to Microsoft: who needs Sender-ID?

2004-09-02 Thread Steve Sobol
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote: Yes. Although Microsoft has refused to disclose what they have actually applied for patents on, their license only applies to specific parts of Sender-ID, which seems to imply that they did not apply for patents on SPF itself. In any case, it is certainly seems safe