What I currently do is install the same version of SA on the other
machine, use sa-learn, and then do a backup. I then go to the other
machine and do a restore. This seems to work great.
Steve
Ingo Reinhart wrote:
Hello!
I want to use sa-learn on a diffrent server than spamd is running. How
can
Take a look at the switches you have in /etc/init.d/spamassassin change
them to only run 5 processess and to die off after 15 or twenty scans.
-m5 --max-conn-per-child=5
Steve
Thomas Cameron wrote:
All -
spamc is suddenly bringing my mail server to its knees.
Running RHEL 4 with the spamassassin-
Hello All,
Justin: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a lot better at effective RAM usage than 3.0.0
... This is because it (a) runs with a
smaller number of active children ... keeps one or two servers very busy, using the
others for "overflow"
We process 60K messages a day and use most of our 10 spamd proc
I have, and I did the same as you along with dropping in another gig of ram.
Steve
Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
Hi all,
I've been using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 for quite some time (about three
month) on my mailservers and so far I didn't notice any problems. Load
and message-throughput have been quite c
