Re: new type of spam

2006-02-15 Thread Spam Ass
These were posted on the SARE-USERS list by Warren Sallade.  They should help you catch some of this.rawbody   __EWG_BAD34   />\s{0,3}V\s{0,3}rawbody   __EWG_BAD35   />\s{0,3}I\s{0,3}rawbody   __EWG_BAD36   />\s{0,3}A\s{0,3}rawbody   __EWG_BAD37   />\s{0,3}G\s{0,3}rawbody   __EWG_BAD38   />\s{0,3}R

Re: lots of new spam

2006-02-09 Thread Spam Ass
Disregard this question.  Appearantly RDJ was not updating itself as I thought it would...  SARE_STOCKS updates fine with the newest version.IanOn 2/9/06, Spam Ass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The best and easiest way is to use RulesD

Re: lots of new spam

2006-02-09 Thread Spam Ass
On 2/9/06, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The best and easiest way is to use RulesDuJour.  This will let youupdate most of the third-party rulesets automatically on a regular basis(including all of the SARE rules). http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJourIs anyone else not gettin

Re: X-Spam Status

2006-01-21 Thread Spam Ass
On 1/21/06, Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   So does SA mark EVERY email with the: X-Spam-Status: Yes/No  header?The only time I have run into an email not being tagged is when the email was over a certain size.  I believe the default max size is 256kb.  This can be changed on a per user or global

Pump and dump stock Blacklist?

2006-01-16 Thread Spam Ass
Hello everyone,Im curious if there are any intitiatives to collect pump and dump stock symbols and names to check against incomming spam.  I've looked around but have yet to find anything.  I think some sort of database would be nice to have to do lookups on and just have it check agains the body o