On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:02 PM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> This is just in the dev ruleset -- for 3.3.0 -- so you're best off adding
>> it manually. right now it's like this:
>>
>> #
>
>
> anyway, if your SA only misses few spam, there's no need to try to improve
> that with new rules.
>
>
>
Yeah, this is the first spam I've gotten in about a month or maybe two.
Still, I let it bug me too much. That, and it's slow at work today. I
guess I'll just let it go.
>
> sought != sought_fraud.
>
Whoops! Thanks! Got it now, but still no hits in that rule set either.
>>>
>>>
>> I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
>> that.
>
> h...
>
> Content analysis details: (6.3 points, 5.0 required)
>
>
> pts rule name description --
> --
> 3.5 BAYES_9
>
> Silly question, but is "peloruso" the user that spamd is running as?
> user/database mismatch is a common problem.
>
I'm not using spamd, I call spamassassin from procmail. I'm on a shared
host that doesn't allow users to run their own daemons (although they are
running their own spamd, but no
Sorry about the double post--operator error.
>> I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
>> that.
>
> Doesn't look to me like you are using bayes. There is no bayes score in
> the headers.
>
Oh. I thought I was. I do get reports in some messages. Here's the
debug from this particular message:
[12541] dbg: config
>> I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
>> that.
>
> Doesn't look to me like you are using bayes. There is no bayes score in
> the headers.
>
Oh. I thought I was. I do get reports in some messages. Here's the
debug from this particular message:
[12541] dbg: config
On Thu, September 18, 2008 9:33 am, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Skip wrote:
>
>
>> What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
>> http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
>>
>
> (1) train your bayes with it
>
I am using bayes, but it didn't catch it. I was quite surprised at
On Thu, September 18, 2008 8:55 am, mouss wrote:
> Skip wrote:
>
>> What can I do to increase my chances on spammies like this one:
>> http://pastebin.com/m5f5d11e0
>>
>>
>
> maybe
>
> header _CTYPE_PLAIN Content-Type =~ m|text/plain| header _CTRANSFER_B64
> Content-Transfer-Encoding =~ m|base64|
>
On Sun, September 7, 2008 10:09 am, Skip wrote:
>
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> It was the
>>> firewall. I go that fixed. Now, here's my next problem. I think taint
>>> mode is stopping razor from running on my system. Since I can't be root,
>>> I have to install Razor in my home home director
> That option wasn't removed from SA.. it was removed from the main conf
> docs, as all of the AWL is now a plugin. That option is documented in the
> docs for the AWL plugin, which is where it really belongs. (if the option
> isn't valid without the plugin, then it in theory shouldn't be in the ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
