Set the option all_spam_to in local.cf.
-Sietse
From: Usagi
Sent: Tue 17-Apr-07 8:47
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: disabling spamassassin for one email address
I have one email address which doesn't need spam assassin because it has a
unique way of rejecting all email except ones
The confusion is about the -u option. Normally spamd runs as root and
spawns a new daemon with uid of the user receiving the e-mail. That
would be recommended indeed. If your users are not local to the machine,
because it is being used as a relay for example the -u option is used to
spawn a new pro
You cannot configure SA to do that. And if you had read the docs you would have
known that.
The reason you have not gotten an answer to this question twice is that you
just as well could have asked the civil engineers forum how to quickly and
easily build an airplane.
-Sietse
From: JOYDEEP
looking for:
/var/run/spamass.sock
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:11 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe
And configure the milter to use the same socket
And configure the milter to use the same socket location as sendmail. You have
probably only configured sendmail to use the new location and left the milter
with the old loaction.
-Sietse
From: SM
Sent: Tue 20-Mar-07 4:14
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: spamassassin not workin
hmmm, unless of course you're government and say it's all in the name of
protection against terrorism
From: Sietse van Zanen
Sent: Thu 15-Mar-07 14:01
To: Jim Maul; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: AW: AW: how to archive/save mails that are scanned by spamd ???
A
And in most countries (including Germany) that will even be illegal without
your user's written consent.
-Sietse
From: Jim Maul
Sent: Thu 15-Mar-07 13:42
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: how to archive/save mails that are scanned by spamd ???
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
It's not hist word list, it's the list of the party he is sending his mail to.
Unfortunately the words 'service' and 'software' whih appear in his image are
in FuzzyOCR's standard word list.
Best thing to do in this case is either remove the image from you mails, or
request to be put on the whi
Yes, but you don't always want to reject such mails. NDR's, automated mails etc
are often send from empty or non-existent e-mail addresses.
You will want to score points, like other SA tests. Maybe a good idea to write
such a test, as it doesn't exist yet.
I know nagios has some tools that can
Well, start with carefully reading the documentation. It will give you better
understanding.
What does a "spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the
auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR doesn't run when a message reaches that score. This saves resources. To debug, make the auto_diable scor 100 or so.
-Sietse
From: Mário
Indeed. If your mail is queuing up due to the RBL checks, something must
be going wrong with the DNS queries.
Do a spamassassin -D --lint mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 15:48
To: Emre BALCI
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rbl Problem
Emre BALCI wrote:
> Hii
I got this scam right after I e-mailed that Emre guy @ yahoo, very
scary
Especially since SA didn't catch it...
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 16:25
To: Emre BALCI
Cc: users@spamassassin.apach
ALL, depending which user is the recipient.
If you want a site wide bayes, you should set that up. (run spamd with
-u 'username')
Users receive different e-mails, so their bayes db tokens will be
different too.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Kelsey Forsythe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oops, forgot to mention, you need to feed a sample message to spamassassin -D
--lint or it will not do network and RBL checks, only local checks.
-Sietse
From: Sandeep Agarwal
Sent: Fri 02-Mar-07 14:15
To: Sietse van Zanen; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: No RBL checks
On 3/2/07
pointers? I thought those were used in cpp programs... I do have a couple
of hints for ya.
*Better look at your init.pre file on machine B. You might have left the RBL
plugins commented out.
*And of course verify whether machine B has working DNS server.
*To test if RBLs are run, run spamas
Can you post (a link to) an example mesage?
I am pretty sure they are caught in my setup.
-Sietse
From: Jack Gostl
Sent: Wed 03-Jan-07 13:26
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: "Dear Homeowner" spam
I've been getting a bunch of spam hawking mortgage rates. You may have seen
it, it s
As per this message:
checking for library containing pnm_readpnminit... no
* * * try option --with-netpbm=PATH
You are lacking some dependencies. Running a make does not make sense when
configure returns these errors. Read the documentation to see what dependencies
need to be satisfied. At leas
SA catches and classifies spam. It does not configure, secure or synchronize
your MTA with any external source.
esto, this is the wrong mailing list for such a question.
The first thing you want to do is try and find an MTA that can achieve the
goals you set. Sendmail probably can, but will ne
Yes, it's called HELO tests.
This example you give should be tagged with FORGED_RCVD_HELO
And SA does loads more HELO tests by default, if it's not working
there's probably something wrong with your DNS setup (missing Net::DNS
or something like that).
Go the the /usr/share/spamassassin/ dir and
If you look at politicians you will surely see that saying: "you
shouldn't ..." wih a straight face is not that hard at all. :-)
Do you have your trusted_networks, internal_networks and all_trusted set
up correctly?
With these three options you should be able to exclude messages sent
from your IP
I second that. :-)
Sa-update works perfectly
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:57 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-update is broken
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:43:28AM -0800, R Lists06 wrote:
That is version 2.x config.
-Sietse
From: Fettke, Dirk
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 16:03
To: Tony Guadagno
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: AW: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
Hi,
I don't know if this works with your solution because I do subject-rewriting in
the amavisd
Rewriting the subject is ultimately the responsibility of the MTA.
So, question is:
What MTA are you using and how does it link SA?
-Sietse
From: Tony Guadagno
Sent: Tue 19-Dec-06 15:45
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help! rewrite_header subject not working for me
Hi,
I have b
Unfortunately I don't know exim, but it seems it cannot cope with SA not
scanning / returning messages due to them bigger than the max msg size.
Don't think that that is a problem SA, because on my sendmail set-up it works
perfectly. Maybe a bug in the local_scan() function?
Wouldn't hurt to po
Yeah sure, blame someone else for your own ignorance..
"Mummy I'm stupid, and it's all your fault..."
Sad and funny at the same time. Oh and while you're at it, go shout at some
people for trying to help you.
I have four more letters for you.
RTFM
MF
From: Yves Goergen
Sent: Mon 18-De
Seems de dmx.net / dmx.de SPF is broken:
> set type=TXT
> gmx.net
Server: 10.10.21.4
Address:10.10.21.4#53
Non-authoritative answer:
gmx.net text = "v=spf1 ip4:213.165.64.0/23 -all"
Authoritative answers can be found from:
> gmx.de
Server: 10.10.21.4
Address:10.10.2
perl -MCPAN -e 'install LWP::UserAgent'
And you might be missing a couple more.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Yves Goergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:16 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update is broken
Hi,
I read in another thread, t
Check if your spamd listens to localhost (127.0.0.1) on port 783. As you dont specify a host with -d that's where spamc will connect to.
a 'telnet localhost 783' will tell you that.
-Sietse
From: Alexander GomerSent: Wed 13-Dec-06 12:27To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: spamc vs.
with what?
From: Gert Horne
Sent: Wed 13-Dec-06 1:36
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Help spamassassin + msql user defined rules
Hi,
I need some help.
I am trying to configure spamassassin to read my user defined rules.
I want to be able to block messages based on body and subjec
Why does this have to be spammers call?
There are loads of legit uses for bulk e-mail.
A member of my family runs an Internet advertising company, which specializes
in for instance opt-in bulk mailing.
For example, small company, which hosts two servers and has 4 employees need to
reach 20.000 c
I figured it would be something like that.
I have moved the spamsink to the milter config. The milter should replace all
recipients with only the spamsink.
-Sietse
From: Matt Kettler
Sent: Fri 08-Dec-06 13:13
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ALL_SPAM_TO not
grep DCC /var/log/maillog
Or
tcpdump port 6277
-Sietse
From: Vernon Webb
Sent: Thu 07-Dec-06 23:55
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: How do I know if DCC is running and working?
Subject says it all. How can I tell if DDC is running and working on my system?
Thanks
I have run across the following situation:
I have a user, which receives all spam unmodified (ALL_SPAM_TO).
When a spam message is sent to multiple users on my machine, including the one
in ALL_SPAM_TO, all users addressed in the message get it unmodified, not only
the ALL_SPAM_TO user. Is this
Nah, that's overdone.
The "linux-based' is waaay too much said... :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 7:43 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: our latest award!
I think I noted this honour on the dev list a
good thing.
More info on the AWL can be found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
-Sietse
From: Kamen TOMOV
Sent: Thu 07-Dec-06 18:00
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: false positives
On четвъртък, Декември 07 2006, Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> They contain to
Sure, use MySQL for bayes storage and have both servers use that DB. Then you
could be fairly sure, both use the same bayes.
I think it should even be possible to dump both databases and migrate into one
SQL db. But I don't use MySQL myself, so I would not know how.
-Sietse
From: Emmanuel L
Think of this anology:
If somebody calls me on my home phone, I immediately see his nr. (If I don't
see a nr. I don't pick up my phone at all). Now, the first thing I'd expect
someone to say when I pick up is his name. If people start talking to me
without stating who they are, it is commercia
They contain too little information.
-Sietse
From: Kamen TOMOV
Sent: Thu 07-Dec-06 14:34
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: false positives
Hi,
I constantly have problems with spamcop these days. Could you tell me
what's wrong with my messages so that I can fix it?
Thanks,
--
Камен
I want the IT staff to change this, but they require some "proof" that the
full name should be there(!).
>That is definite proof of an incompetent IT staff..
I use sendmail and spamassassin-milter. I configured SA to tag messages
as spam if they score 6.0 points. The milter rejects if the score gets
above 15. I use every plugin available, dcc, fuzzy, razor, pyzor, DNSBL
etc, so usually spam scores above 15, and I have never seen a false
positive with a
There is an updated fuzzy-find.pl script available, that has an option
to register hashes in a db.
Usage: fuzzy-find.pl [Options] (imagehash|imagefile)
Available options:
--delete Removes the hash from the database
--learn-ham Add the hash as ham to the database
--learn-spam Add the hash as
I do not speak French, though I learned some in high school.
Signature faite le mer 22 nov 2006 00:58:01
Now, I'm only familiar with faite l'amour, but doesn't that mean the
certificate is expired? If so, the channel maintainer should renew it.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Noc Phib
Plain and simple, put you bayes in a MySQL database.
-Sietse
From: Jack Gostl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 09:17
To: Spamass
Subject: bayes error
I've been looking at the spams that slip through, and I notice that they
have no Bayes score. Not a low score
You should upgrade spamass-milter too. The error is from the milter, not SA
itself.
-Sietse
From: Chris Edwards
Sent: Thu 30-Nov-06 16:28
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spamassasin Has Quit Working
Hello All!
I have been running with spamassassin & spamass-milter sucsessfully fo
Are all the users local to your machine (they do not connect with SMTP to send
mail)? If so, I reckon you could just have your MTA block any incoming mail
that seems to be coming from your domain.
If your users do need to SMTP to your server, you could set up an internal and
an external MTA on
Might be because of this header:
Received: from IBM-707AC13EF89 (unknown [82.166.48.182])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mydomain.ac.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F019F2C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:56:13 +0200 (IST)
[EMAIL P
I beleive razor log files and config go into the homedir of the user running
spamassassin.
For me, Í run SA as user spamassassin and that user's homedir is
/var/lib/spamassassin.
There is a .razor dir there, wheere all the files are.
-Sietse
From: Chris Purves
Sent: Fri 24-Nov-06 0:50
To: u
Use su or sudo.
su -l user -c spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist=addr
sudo -u user spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist=addr
-Sietse
From: Andrea Bencini
Sent: Mon 20-Nov-06 18:26
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: AWL
To manage AWL I should use this command
spamassassin
baldo
Sent: Mon 20-Nov-06 16:47
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: How do I stop these?
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
Probably by configuring spamassassin right. It scores 14.7 points on my spamd, withouth SARE or Stock rules:
I am a semi novice at SA, but learning everyday and thing
Probably with him being too lazy to copy and paste his original message from
the other board, or list..
Well, I am too lazy to follow his link...
From: Theo Van Dinter
Sent: Tue 21-Nov-06 15:24
To: CosmicPerl
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problems running Spam Assassin
These mails stay there for 5 days. At least if you set up sendmail according to
RFC's.
that's the whole idea of SMTP store and forward. If address is unavailable,
keep trying for a while before giving up. You can set the grace time to any
period you like btw.
-Sietse
From: CosmicPerl
Sent:
And you have added all the users, that need access to the users group in
/etc/group?
IE your /etc/group file contains a line like:
users:x:100:user1,user2,user3,user4,useretc
If so, than it is spamassassin that does not switch the user context correctly.
-Sietse
From: Robert S
Sent: Tue 21-
sh into the known good db.
6. Correct the config. (and restart maild).
7. Send in a feature request to update the fuzzy-find.pl script to
insert hashes into a db. ;-)
-Sietse
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 20
Ofcourse, save the image, calculate the hash and then use the
fuzzy-find.pl script to delete it from the bad hash db.
Next you'll have to use a little trick to get it into the good hash db,
as that's not possible from the fuzzy-find.pl script.
Simply make an empty word list and yank the image
Title: RE: Spamassassin Rules
Yes, spamassassin definitely RULES! ;-D
DNS time-outs are usually 10 seconds.
14-10 = 4, which is normal.
I would check if your DNS tests run smoothly and do not time out somewhere.
-Sietse
From: Justin MasonSent: Thu 28-Sep-06 17:00To: John D. HardinCc: Deephay; Olivier Nicole; users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re: really sl
Title: Message
It's best to use cpan for this. It's very easy to use and will automagically resolve any dependencies.
Other way is find the modules on http://rpmfind.net/
Specify your search as perl-net-dns etc.
-Sietse
From: Philippe CouasSent: Wed 27-Sep-06 16:15To: users@spamassassin.
rewrite_subject is nowadays rewrite_header subject
-Sietse
From: Steve IngrahamSent: Mon 25-Sep-06 18:55To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Get an error when updating RDJ
>> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: report_header 1
>
>> config: SpamAssassin failed to pa
Check if the user you are running spamassassin under has r/w access to the files in /var/spool/exim4/.spamassassin/bayes
It is also best if you run spamd with option '-u user' if you have a side wide bayes. Otherwise all your local users + the user nobody need r/w access.
-Sietse
From: Car
Probably the writers of the module have decided to use strict references in their programming.
You can do 1 of 2 things:
1. donwgrade back to 0.53.
2. edit the perl source for the new module and disable strict references. There should be a line that says 'use strict;'. Add a line 'no strict '
In my experience, you can just reuse the database. I upgraded SA several times and never came across issues with the bayes DB.
I'm am not using SQL however.But as long as the DB format, tables etc. do not change, you should be able to just reuse it, without hte need for export / import.
Maki
Might be a corrupted database. Try moving it and start with a clean one. If the lint succeeds it is your bayes db.
-Sietse
From: RamprasadSent: Wed 13-Sep-06 13:25To: spamassassin-usersSubject: spamassassin --lint just hangs
I find that
spamassassin -D --lint sometimes just hangs.
the outp
Yes, there are content scanning engines which can do this. They are usually based on ICAP or Checkpoints CVP. McAfee and TrendMicro supply such software. But it remains to be seen whether these interoperate with your MTA.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't ClamAV able to recursively scan U
There are profound differences between the SPARC and X86 architectures, even within the Solaris OS. One of these is an endian difference.
From your comment I conclude, that you have not ported spamassassin to X86, but only to SPARC.
It therefore will likely not work on X86. Anyway you should s
e no bombs at all
-Sietse
From: Tony Finch on behalf of Tony Finch
Sent: Mon 07-Aug-06 13:26
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: 0451.com
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Caring about 'legitimate' e-mail coming
Caring about 'legitimate' e-mail coming from these domains would be like caring
about the 'legitimate' claims of Bush saying he is a true christian...
-Sietse
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 07-Aug-06 11:32
To: users@spamassassin.ap
For razor usage, you can always see if traffic goes to the server by tcpdumping
on port 2703
-Sietse
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 04-Aug-06 14:14
To: decoder; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tests for SPF and Razor?
You might have a static IP, but if it's from an ISP DSL/Cable range, it will
still be in SORBS.
-Sietse
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 02-Aug-06 16:23
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: This list using SORBS?
I tried sending a message to
SPAM is canned HAM... HAM is the backside of any animal, typically the meat
made from that part, though the shoulder part is also referred to as HAM.
Eating to much HAM will make you fat and too lazy to search archives, wikipedia
or google...
-Sietse
-Sietse
From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 26-Jul-06 12:37
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Re: SA Score -> Confidence Percentage
I can see how plugins and add-on rules all affect it, but certainly
they have some sort of base comparison t
I think such a thing would be very difficult. Because scoring is mostly
dependant on your personal configuration of SA. The more plugins you use, the
higher the score will be. And that is independant of spam probability.
You might be able to compare bayes probabilities with SA scores, but autom
Or just block the lists mail servers in your firewall.
You'll be automatically removed after a week or so
-Sietse
From: Magnus Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 17-Jul-06 14:33
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unsubscribing from SA
And that trick could also very well cause you to loose legitimate e-mail..
I don't think it's RFC compliant either.
Somehow, this feels to me like throwing out your garbage on the street and then
saying, Hey I got rid of it.
-Sietse
From: Marc Perkel
Sent: Wed 12-Jul-06 14:55
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: spam script
That deleted all of the cur directory within the .Junk E-mail directory.
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Loose the * and do rm -rf (recursively deletes the directory)
>
Loose the * and do rm -rf (recursively deletes the directory)
-Sietse
From: Nicholas Payne-Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12-Jul-06 14:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: spam script
I am now trying to figure out how to use find in a si
Yes, it's indeed better to smoke a blunt... :-p
From: Tom Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12-Jul-06 13:24
To: hansje2000
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problems on rethad 9.0
> Nope thats no asolution redhat Fedore works in the same w
It's either upgrade, or if you're lucky Dag Wieers' packages still work for
your old system:
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/spamassassin/
-Sietse
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12-Jul-06 12:06
To: hansje2000
Cc: users@spamassassin
Hi,
You are probably editting the wrong local.cf file then.
Try a spamassassin -D --lint to see where it gets it's config form.
And of course read the docs.
-Sietse
From: tomcatf14 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12-Jul-06 7:48
To: users@spamassassin.apa
Isn't that because of the forged helo?
[28763] dbg: eval: forged-HELO: from= helo=baby by=uuserver.net
My sendmail would drop this mail even before it reaches spamassassin.
Also, I find it a little ironic, that the hostmaster of the once notorious
UUnet network, spammers safe haven in the early
Have you checked the directory for correct permissions? And there is a database
there?
Also the configuration option for bayes has been changed. Where it used to take
a path, it now takes a filename.
eg. used to be bayes_path /dir/bayes/ (would create db in that dir) and now is
bayes_path /dir
If it doesn't say it's not working, it is working. The messages
indicate, that razor is called.
If you want to be sure, just check your spam mails, some of them should
contain a RAZOR tag. Or snoop the network for trafic to the razor
servers.
-Sietse
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Murphy
Have you loaded all of the respected plugins in init.pre?
If so, run spamassassin -D --lint and post output here. It'ss give you the
reasons for not being able to parse the config lines.
-Sietse
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 14-J
g why the position of the headers had changed.
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Well, it has. But AFAIK it has not caused problems on other than
> spamass-milter.
>
> Search the mailing list, there's much more on this issue. But not sure about
> win2003 installa
un-06 13:40
To: Sietse van Zanen; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: X-Spam-Headers at top of email
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.2 on windows 2003 server called via
the command line, so I think it must be something in SpamAssassin that has
changed.
Thanks
Ben
-Original Me
It's a bug in spamass-milter 0.3.0. Upgrade to 0.3.1
-Sietse
From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 12-Jun-06 12:56
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: X-Spam-Headers at top of email
For some reason when I upgraded recently, Spamassassin i
Don't know about qmail, but in sendmail you can easily reject the mail because
of this 'forged helo'.
-Sietse
From: Jason Staudenmayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 09-Jun-06 15:35
To: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE
Please send in some examples and output of spamassassin --lint -D. version
numbers, milter version, sendmail version, configuration files etc. etc.
You are aware about changes to the operation & configuration of SA3.1.1 and
3.1.2? Lots of things have changed and this needs to be adjusted in th
1. SA3.x seems to need a little more memory + cpu than 2.x. If you can't add
memory just up the time-out value for your milter or other piping mechanism
you're using.
2. Lots and lots and then lots more has changed in the configuration between
2.64 and 3.1.1. Read the documentation on configur
I use a dedicated SMTP gateway running RH EL3 sendmail + SpamAssassin + ClamAV
to virus and spam check my e-mail before it goes into Exchange.
This should be fairly easy to set up as spamassassin is run without user
preferences and only uses local configuration. You might need to change MX
rec
Or do some tcpdumping on ports UDP 6277 (DCC) and TCP 2703 (Razor2)
-Sietse
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 24-May-06 15:24
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re[2]: checksumming image spam
Paul Matthews wrote:
> > > And to
Because Hotmail is NOTmail.
Hotmail (Microsofties), does not reply to abuse and postmaster mails. That's is
against RFC, not nice, anti-social etc. etc.
Therefor hotmail, as the same with yahoo is SPAM by default. Some mail server
admins even block mail coming from there by default.
-
then 8.
>
> Each time it gets up to using the swap space, regardless of how much I put
> in there.
>
> Thanks for the thoughts, I will let this one ride out a little longer to see
> what happens.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[E
As long as you don't make money out of your spam filtering.
But I assume it would only cost you money to do so. :-)
-Sietse
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 24-May-06 3:23
To: Paul Matthews; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re[2
There you have said it: A good spam filter. And I was talking about
Outlook.. :-)
From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 23-May-06 13:18
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Outlook 2003 Junk filter
Does anybody have any idea why the Outlook 2003 Junk Mail filter dumps a
message from the mailing list into the Junk Mail Folder every now and then?
-Sietse
Indeed, as long as it says swap: 0k used I would say it is just good memory
management. :-)
-Sietse
From: Michael Monnerie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 23-May-06 9:34
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamd memory leak?
On Dienstag, 23. M
is already there), so
better get your CPAN right and use perl newer than 5.8.3.
-Sietse
From: Paul Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 22-May-06 15:16
To: Sietse van Zanen
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: checksumming image spam
> D
DCC is at: http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/
Don't know about rpm's, you can try http://rpmfind.net (Don't think they have
RH EL rpms)
Or http://dag.wieers.com
But probably you'll have to compile it yourself (As I did for my RH EL3), which
is pretty simple.
-Sietse
___
Hmmm, odd
What happens if you disable user preferences all together?
From: Will Nordmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19-May-06 16:09
To: Sietse van Zanen; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Systemwide Bayes ...
No bayes path in the
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
