Robert - elists-2 wrote:
>
> Since you posted that you do not mind using a console shell, you could
> always do what everyone else does and do some debugging and research and
> post your results...
>
Funnily enough that's the useful response. This would be a much more useful
list if instead o
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> Did you by any chance "edit" your post?
>
No, I clicked the Resend button. Not Nabble's fault. The SA mailing list
says on its page that posting from Nabble without registering for the list
is fine. But it's not. I need to register, then I can use the Nabble
inte
Rubin Bennett wrote:
>
> the lack of information relevant to
> this mailing list and it's source prompted me to send perhaps a stronger
> response than was necessary.
This is the SpamAssassin users list. For people who are using SpamAssassin
and having trouble with it.
My post was absolute
ere can we "enable local.cf for my setup"? In WHM's interface, SA
is setup to follow server wide settings.
Beyond that, where is SA to be configured so that it picks up both the
local.cf for server default settings, with user_prefs taking precedence
where an individual domain has set
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> You sure about that?
>
> They don't understand the very basics of email. They just managed
> *again* to send the very same Message-Id *twice*. Yeah, the Nabble folks
>
I am subscribed to this list. Perhaps whoever manages the SA list page
(http://wiki.apache
Rubin Bennett wrote:
>
> If you want to post to this list, please subscribe like a regular user,
> and do your research first before you post. Nabble, in a word, sucks.
>
When the SpamAssassin mailing list page stops recommending Nabble, perhaps
users will stop posting from Nabble.
http://wi
As you will see from the headers, for some reason it is still forcing a test
against "Required Score" of 2.5. I am trying to see where it is getting this
instruction of 2.5 from.
1. In my server-wide /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have this:
required_score 12
2. In my user_prefs for an i
