Also, I would add the path to your "auto-whitelist" file
by adding this to your local.cf:
auto_whitelist_path /home/spam/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:07:48AM -1000, Chan, Wilson wrote:
> That seemed to fix it. I guess the default is to create a prefs path.
> Thanks!
> We use site-wise bayes here too. While users can report FN's and FP's,
> IT staff reviews the submissions prior to actual learning. This prevents
Since 90% of users use outlook/outlook express, how do they report
their spam to you? Put differently, how do you extract spam out of
outlook and outl
uestion for exim users.
Just curious if anybody has a quick tip on this. All right, off to read
the exim manual...
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 03:46:33PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started piping my mail through SA a couple of months ago and I've
> been diligently
I think I'm dealing with a similar situation. Here's what you could try.
Forget about changing the user that spamd runs as. The fact that it
falls back to nobody maybe ok. Say your tokens are located in
/home/admin/.spamassassin. Open /etc/spamassassin/local.cf and put these
two lines in there:
ba
Hello,
I started piping my mail through SA a couple of months ago and I've
been diligently marking messages as spam for the bayes subsystem. Then I
noticed that neither the headers of messages nor the analysis reports
have anything about bayes rules.
I'm running exim and here's what I have in t
> Consider < 3 months (better: < 1 month) for spam, < 6 months for ham.
Thanks! I thought nobody would reply! I know what to do now.
> antidrug.cf is unnecessary on SA 3.0.0 and higher. The rules have
> been incorporated into the default set. Your "drug" message probably
> doesn't trigger any of the rules. Take a look at the file and see
> what it is looking for.
Cool! Thank you!
I just downloaded antidrug.cf from drugemporium and dropped it in the
rules directory. spamassassin -D says that it's reading it but running a
"drug" message through doesn't trigger the rules. Should I rename
antidrug.cf to say 35_antidrug.cf or it doesn't matter? Is there anyway
I can test the rul
.1 the Online Pharmaceutical SPAM also came
> >>through. It didn't take much effort to
> >>run sa-learn --spam on a bunch of them to shut them out. The spammers
> >>are trying some new tricks right
> >>now which will get through a fresh upgrade but again manual tra
> Side-note.. what version of SA did you diff against?
I downloaded Mail-SpamAssassin-current from the ftp. I thought that was
a link to the most current version. I might have been wrong.
> All that said, you might be OK with debian's SA 3.0.2-3. While it's
> important to be fairly current on SA,
:40:03PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
> > 3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
> > deviate from the official pac
Hello everybody,
Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the rules, they seem to be the
same.
12 matches
Mail list logo
