pache.org
> Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of skenn...@office.vcn.com
> designates 209.193.90.171 as permitted sender)
> Received: from [209.193.90.171] (HELO thor.geekdom.vcn.com) (209.193.90.171)
> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:50:39 +
Is there any way to use both an SQL configuration for virtual user
preferences, but at the same time use file-based bayes databases for virtual
users?
The spamd man page for the "-virtual-config-dir" option states:
"Note that this requires that -x is used, and cannot be
comb
AM, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> I'm running SpamAssassin v3.3.1. A message with 500 lines of text
> (22k) is taking 6-7 seconds.
>
> This is using spamc. I am using a Bayes DB (no auto expire/learn)
> that's stored in SQL. User preferences are also stored in SQL. I
> ha
I'm running SpamAssassin v3.3.1. A message with 500 lines of text
(22k) is taking 6-7 seconds.
This is using spamc. I am using a Bayes DB (no auto expire/learn)
that's stored in SQL. User preferences are also stored in SQL. I
have skip_rbl_checks on. I am using only the official rules from
up
doesn't in 3.2, any
insight?
Thanks,
Sean
Sean Kennedy wrote:
I recently upgraded from v3.1.9 to v3.2.4 and I've noticed a substantial
increase in scan times. The general average scantime with v3.1 was
about 1.2s and now with v3.2 it's about 2.2s. It's enough of a slow
I recently upgraded from v3.1.9 to v3.2.4 and I've noticed a substantial
increase in scan times. The general average scantime with v3.1 was
about 1.2s and now with v3.2 it's about 2.2s. It's enough of a slow
down so that my mail queue backs quite easily now.
So I'm trying to debug SA and fig
