On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 11:26, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> SA Rules Rule #1: No single rule should EVER cause an email to be marked as
> spam.
>
> Interestingly enough..
>
> SA Rules Rule #2348: All pron spam should be diverted to the marketing dept.
Interestingly enough, my previous filtering s
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 17:10, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > >
> > > So you might want to add the following to your user_prefs:
> > > score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 100 0 100
> That *is* the per-user basis. Each user has a
> ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file. Just put your score mods there.
So it is. I'm
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100?
>
> That would be tha answer. I believe "how" might also have been part of
> that question.
I thought it was...sorry if I wasn't clear, but "how" is exactly what
I'm after.
>
> Search for the U
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any message
carrying a URL that's listed on surbl.org or spamhaus.org is 100% spam,
what file(s) wo
