t and should not control the envelope sender.
If this gets through, it's something you can change in configuration.
--
Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/
But I forgot all about the Amnesia Conference!!
isplays, and every pixel is precious. I also wonder what text-to-speech
>processing does with subject line decoration.
I read mine in an 80x2[45] ssh terminal.
(Anyone inviting me to change the terminal size or get a bigger screen
is invited to a) smeg off b) give me the money for the bi
5 PM 9/14/2004, you wrote:
>>>Would it be possible to have emails to this list have
>>something such as
>>
>>>"[SA-LIST} Subject here" in the subject line for easier
>>sorting of the
>>>emails in folders? This is actually the first list am using that
>>doesn't
>>>have anything unique in the subject.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Predrag
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>Jeff Koch, Intersessions
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/
Damn it Jim, I'm a doctor, not a SysOp.
have anything unique in the subject.
Why not sort on the List-ID? The List-ID may have changed several
times, but I've never (or rarely enough that I don't remember) had to
change my procmail rule, which says:
:0:
* ^List-ID:.*spamassassin
mail/satalk
Yeah, I know everyone doesn&#
ook at the
>relevant SPF record and blacklist/high-score all of the hosts it states
>are valid sources for that sender domain.
As Kelson said, this would cause unacceptable FP problems. Unless
someone eyeballed it first.
--
Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/
All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound ?
