t me if I am wrong. That is, at least, how I am
> doing it here and is working fine.
I just tried that, and it looks like that fixed the issue. I'll do some
more testing, but it seems fine. Thanks :)
Ryan Thoryk
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> Using it with the Postfix pipe command makes it very slow. Have you considered
> using the Sendmail milter interface integrated in Postfix in combination with
> the SpamAssassin milter?
I haven't tried that - probably should be using that instead :)
Also one other thi
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> "The old non-lookup line works fine"
>
> spamc has no option -f
>
> How can that work fine?
>
> If the old line works fine, why do you try to raplace with a new line?
I noticed the extra "-f", and will remove it. The new line has the "-u"
option, since we're trying to
bove, but SA is only processing the first
message and never handing it back to Postfix, while the other messages
never seem to get processed at all (nothing at all about them in the
logs). The old non-lookup line works fine. Has anyone here experienced
similar issues?
Ryan Thoryk
--
Ryan Thoryk
