Fix to above post's last lines:
MX server scores it as spam score 200 --> MX server just nukes it
MX server scores it as spam score 16 - MX tags it as spam --> sendmail
farm just files it in the user's \Caught-Spam folder.
MX server scores it as score 7, which is below questionable which is set
I have a unique but interesting problem:
I have a farm of servers that use Sendmail/ProcMail/SpamAssassin.
Due to their very heavy loads and my custom rules, I have built a
dual-proc-dual-core FBSD AMD64 bit OS server to do nothing but my major
spam knockdowns and processing to send back to the
S
I'm using the latest SpamAssassin, and I was wondering if there was a list
of all the RBL's that SpamAssassin checks if you have "skip_rbl_checks 0"
Why?
Well, my servers are darn busy and my scantimes are high causing my load
averages to sometimes get over 25 (my stop-receiving mail load point)
For what it's worth, our spam counts are also significantly down.
I think the main spammer that's been doing the Rolex and Mitigating drugs
went on vacation with the stock spamer for a few days.
-Russ
> Did you check v310.pre and init.pre config files?
> Jonn
Those are in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin and I'm not using those
So since my config directory is defined as /etc/mail/spamassassin... it
should ignore those, yes?
But if it WASN'T ignoring those, why does sa-learn still go after
> Russ.. did you run sa-learn --sync after you did your upgrade?
>
I did, and I ran it again and noticed something odd...
My config dir is /etc/mail/spamassassin
My local.cf USED to have /usr/local/etc/bayes/bayes as the bayes_path, but
I have since changed it to /tmp/bayes/bayes and /tmp/bayes
> According to the docs these two options where removed.
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.8
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 12.0
>
> Check your log to see if you have any errors.
>
> Jonn
I don't know how
I'm upgrading my existing server farm from SpamAss 3.0.x to 3.1.0... all
is fine except Bayes. Identical setup, no pathing changes, same local.cf
file - everything... but bayes isn't working.
Here are my bayes setups in my local.cf:
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_lea
> Anyone using inetd to launch spamd? I've had my process die a couple of
> times and it would be nice to have inetd around to make sure it's allways
> running. If you have, what did you put in inetd.conf?
>
> Thanks!
>
I use FreeBSD, so mine starts with my rc.d startup. You could always start
the
I wrote these rules last week that stop em fast, even before the URIBL's
kick in.
# This will fire if 2 or more are found
rawbody __DRUGS268A /^V$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268B /^I$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268C /^C$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268D /^E$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268E /^33$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268F /^\=20$/i
meta DRUGS
10 matches
Mail list logo
