e're back to users having to understand munging,
manually having to edit whitelists, and so forth.
This issue isn't very important to me, but I would think of it as sad if
spamsassassin became less usefull by default due to overzealousness. For
me it's easy enough just to edit the rules to suit my needs and remove the
over-board URI checks, but ..
--
Rune Kristian Viken
Basefarm AS
Tlf: (+47) 98 28 28 41
a visit and tell them what we
think about them?
regards,
$name
:::
.. that message is fully legit, and the only "wrong" thing about it is the
mentioning of the uri. It'll get blocked, while still violating nothing
more than one rule that in practice is repeated multiple times.
--
Rune Kristian Viken
Basefarm AS
Tlf: (+47) 98 28 28 41
sure on how to do that. I've not been able to dig
that up through the docs. If it's a bad idea - please do not hesitate to
point it out.
Also, David B Funk suggested using -L , indicating "No network tests". As
mentioned, I'm cosidering using SURBL. Is it possible to stil
till be in order.
Suggestions?
--
Rune Kristian Viken
Tlf: (+47) 98 28 28 41
