UCProtect and backscatterrer.org are BOTH doing this. In my opinion they even
could well be controlled by spammers and taking money on both ends of the this.
I personally feel abused by them since they appear to be stroking their lists
simply to make money.
Ron Smith
postmas...@pmbx.net
ately involved in the pay for play delisting
services? Why, spammers can create the need for the delisting payments
simply by increasing the spam output and make more money and and at
both ends.
Ron Smith
postmas...@pmbx.net
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building.&q
I think razor is not free anymore.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Sep 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Skip wrote:
Sep 06 09:25:48.685019 admin[5746]: [ 5] Razor Discovery Server
discovery.razor.cloudmark.com is unreachable
Se
r 33957
Three of these seem to indicate there is a problem in one of the rules
with the required_score. But which rule?
Or is it possibly SQL userpref entries with preference =
'required_score' and value = '' that is causing this? I have found 176
of those entries in
Yes, because rather than use a honeypot, you can forward as an
attachment to Spamcop. SA uses Spamcop in its scoring so indirectly
you improve your SA scoring accuracy if you do that. I strongly
recommend all our users do that also.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email probl
nterpreted a memory
leak issue?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
Thanks, Kai, for you great comments.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Jul 26, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Finally: figures :-)
These figures do not indicate any problems. That "inactive memory"
is
Hi, Bowie.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Jul 25, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
DNS tests generally do not cause major slowdowns unless you have one
that is not responding. The tests are run in parallel with the
Hello, Kai. Your comments are much appreciated.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sure you got that reply. You quoted his mail. But you didn't answer
the
question about
s coming
and hold my feet to the fire on this till I get it resolved. ;-)
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Robert - elists wrote:
Ron
You are kinda shooting in the dark on the memory leak thread
ight be causing long pauses in responses. Just
about 5 weeks ago I had a DDoS saturating my incoming SMTPs... Despite
that, and without SA running we were able to function. (I'd be glad to
share individually with anyone the details of how we did that if you
are suffering the same.)
R
gb originally)
and have a total of 8gb in my hot little hands to install if need be.
And I too am only using my mailserver, spamd, clamd, named, but I also
run freshclamd which updates the viral database four times a day.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but
Kai, I tried to explain that I didn't get that email response. We have
been having mail delivery issues as a result of this problem. I was
asking for help, not a scolding. You assume wrongly that because you
didn't get a reply that I ignored you... I didn't get your repon
s above, thereby preventing CGPro from killing the script
prematurely. That's a next step. If the delay in processing is still
present then, I would think that I've moved suspicion away from CG Pro/
spamd interaction as a cause for this.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having
ut setting for
spamd?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
On Jul 25, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I don't know much about how SA handles memory internally, but I do
know
that it tends to be a memory hog. This
sound obscure, but believe me, I'm not a
novice and there seems to be a real issue. I've considered even
dropping back to OS 10.4.11, a time-consuming but possibly necessary
step in further identifying this issue.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painfu
le .tmp extensions. I'd be very interested to hear
from anyone else who've had issues like these that seemed to be
improved with compilation.
All respectful and cordial replies will be greeted with equal
response. ;-)
Ron Smith
Veteran Pediatrician of 25 years
Harley-Davidson Ult
the cgpav helper turned off in CommuniGate Pro.
I downgraded from CommuniGate Pro 3.2.5 to 3.2.2 late last night with
no difference either. These problems all have arisen not long after I
upgraded from SA 3.1.8 to 3.2.5 about 2 to 3 weeks ago.
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an e
gs of ram in my
PowerMac G5 as well. At some point all mail movement in SA stalls.
Anyone else seeing this?
Ron Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Having an email problem is painful, but character-building."
| /usr/bin/spamc -d 127.0.0.1 -t 800 -u "$Username" >>
"$myCgate/Submitted/$NewFile"
Thanks,
Ron
On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:39 AM, SM wrote:
At 17:34 16-07-2008, Ron Smith wrote:
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission
Hello again. I have not received any feedback from anyone. I would
really appreciate any help.
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I am seeing orphaned files th
Hi,
I'm using spamc/spamd with CommuniGate Pro. When spamd puts the file
in the submission folder it USUALLY gets a .sub extension applied
within a minute or two. However I am seeing orphaned files that are
both non-spam and spam that just get left as .tmp files. Many times
these files ha
22 matches
Mail list logo
