RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:30 +0200 > Rob Sterenborg wrote: > > > > > What bothers me is that I can't update the > > > > spam_count and ham_count fields because AFAIK I don't have > > > > information about that. > > > > > &g

RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

> -Original Message- > From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:00 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: When force-expire doesn't work... > > Rob, > > > Because bayes_seen was also quite big I read up on that too. > > Since

RE: When force-expire doesn't work...

> -Original Message- > From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:23 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: When force-expire doesn't work... > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:40:29 +0200 > Rob Sterenborg wrote:

When force-expire doesn't work...

Hello, I'm in the process of installing a new relay MTA, and part of it means moving the current Bayes database to the new server (bdb -> MySQL). The database is quite big because of the bayes_token and bayes_seen tables, so I wanted to expire old data. I've set bayes_expiry_max_db_size=100

RE: [SPAM:9.6] Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster

On 2010-02-24, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > Postfix: I would have two different smtpd daemons - one for > You don't have to run two postfixes for this. I think Per means: 2 smtpd processes, not 2 Postfixes.. -- Rob

RE: Outlook 2007/imap headers

> Hello, > > Almost all my user use Outlook :( > > In the past with Outlook 2003, I was using an IMAP account to > permit > my users to transmit their spam with all the headers. But now with > Outlook 2007 I lost almost all the headers when the email is moved > to > an IMAP account. > > Anyone

RE: Pyzor and cloudmark

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 12.03.08 16:30, R.Smits wrote: >> Forget it >> >> I have just discovered DCC . >> Looks a lot better :-) > > they are very different things. I advise using both (or, all three) Since I witnesed slow responses and timeouts from Pyzor (yes, also with the alte

RE: FuzzyOcr: selecting what frame for animated GIFs

Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > By default FuzzyOcr will analize only one frame from animated GIFs. > > If the animation goes one word by frame: "Click", "Here", "Now", > selecting only one frame will give no sensible result. It woul dbe > better to concatenate all the frames into one single imag

RE: What to do with known spam connections

SM wrote: > The spam content shouldn't even be getting through as the recipient > address is invalid. Unless you don't know who your recipients are, which may be the case when operating a mailrelay. (I'm not saying that such situation is optimal...) Grts, Rob

RE: FuzzyOCR not working.

>> This is a wild guess, but what do you have in >> /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/ directory? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/ And what is the output of: ls -al /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr/

RE: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams

Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: > Anyway, the Faculty I work for tries to keep the e-mail system only > for research purposes, and mostly students and (sadly) technicians > tend to goof around with mail. Bandwidth isn't cheap here, so they > decided to straightly cut those extensions. Remember, the custo

RE: unsubscribed

Steve Ingraham wrote: > I cannot help but comment on this post. Neither can I. > I am one of those ignorant people that is subscribed to this list > (along with several others) for the purpose of asking questions of > you experts out there because I do not fully understand how it is > working. B

RE: Unique nigerian spam

ram wrote: > Now we have nigerian spam that actually refers to compensating > victims of scam > > https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/nigerian.txt > > The spammer is insane. Does he thing a real victim would be foolish > enough to fall in his trap again > > OTOH > Unfortunately , this mail went clean

RE: RulesDuJour

>> The page describes how to select what channels sa-update >> will update. You'll just have an extra sa-update in your >> crontab; one for the official SA rules and one for the SARE rules. >> > > I have only one sa-update in my crontab Yes, sorry, it can be done using 1 sa-update line; I actual

RE: RulesDuJour

Rocco Scappatura wrote: >> But it is. >> >> RulesDuJour delivery is broken, and it gives only HTTP-error page, >> which causes the error. >> >> sa-update can deliver the rules without errors. > > However, I already use sa-update other than RulesDuJour, which is > scheduled as follow: The webp

RE: autolearn=failed

Raquel wrote: > On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400 > Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Raquel wrote: >>> >>> >>> I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call >>> spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting >>> "autolearn=failed". >>> >> Inter

RE: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA?

Marc Perkel wrote: >> Marc Perkel wrote: >>> OK - it's interesting that of all of you who responded this >>> is the only person who is doing it right. I have to say that >>> I'm somewhat surprised that so few people are preprocessing >>> their email to reduce the SA load. As we all know SA is very

RE: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA?

Marc Perkel wrote: > As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie. > using blacklist and whitelist before SA) We don't. I could sum it up but it basically looks like John's setup, except we also use SPF and greylisting in the SMTP session and that ClamAV isn't the only virus

RE: DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Rob Sterenborg wrote on Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:32:57 +0200: > >> Didn't look it up but this is not a hostname, is a TXT record so I >> guess it's treated differently.. > > Good explanation, but looking it up I see there *is* an A record >

RE: DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:03:42 +0200: > >> _domainkey > > BTW, doesn't the use of an underscore in a hostname violate RFC? Didn't look it up but this is not a hostname, is a TXT record so I guess it's treated differently.. Grts, Rob

RE: DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME

Matt Kettler wrote: > Rob Sterenborg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was looking around to see if I could find what >> >> DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME >> Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails >> >> actually means, but I can't find it. >> >

DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME

Hi, I was looking around to see if I could find what DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails actually means, but I can't find it. When I send an email fromy work email address to my home email server, this rule is hit for that email, but I'm quite sure that we have n

RE: pyzor problem.

Rose, Bobby wrote: > I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who > maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover. The alternative server aparently never got added to the discovery service so the discover command will reset the contents to the original

RE: Re: not everyone is happy with SA

Per Jessen wrote: > Like I said - provided that the objective is to avoid spam, it might > work for the individual user. The objective of C-R was never (IMO) to > help reduce or eliminate spam other than for one person. However, there isn't just one email user; there's a lot of them. If every pri

RE: spam scoring -2.6

Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm getting creamed with these spams but they are getting > through due to; > > > -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0005] > > Why is this happening? This only says that Bayes doesn't think the email looks like spam

RE: older SA 2.7

Peter Mikeska (MiKi) wrote: > Hello, > > I want ask some1 of you about version of SA 2.70. > This release was released ever ? or it was just abandoned and > replaced with 3.0 ? If it exist , could you please provide me link ? > > thank you http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-us

RE: [Possible SPAM] Posts tagged as Subject: [Possible SPAM]

Chris wrote: > Since changing to embarqmail.com last Sunday each post I've > made to this list has been marked-up as "possible spam". Is > Embarq that screwed up? Or is Synacor? Here are the markups > on the one I just posted: > > X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > X-Old-Spam-Flag

RE: Alternative to red.uribl.com?

>> Maybe have a look at using "The Day Old Bread List" DNSRBL? >> More info at http://support-intelligence.com/dob/ >> > This seems to be a intelligent idea. Can I subscribe to their DOB > lists alone. > > What are the zones to query ? The webpage states that: - "The list is currently in ALPHA a

RE: unsubscribe

> From: Cristi Tudose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 8 februari 2007 8:10 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: unsubscribe See email header: list-help: list-unsubscribe: Grts, Rob

RE: unsbsribe me

> From: usha chowdary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: woensdag 7 februari 2007 11:23 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: unsbsribe me > > unsbsribe me Look in your email headers: list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post:

RE: FuzzyOcr Log Entries

David Baron wrote: > 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamthreshold > 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for pamtopnm > 2007-01-09 08:47:15 [6426] Cannot find executable for tesseract > > These are listed as helpers to the program. What needs to be > installed to

Somethnig not passed to FuzzyOcr?

Hi, I recently installed FuzzyOcr (3.5.0-rc1, now 3.5.1) and got it to work using MailScanner-4.51 and SpamAssassin-3.1.7 and Postfix-2.3. Since a day or two focr isn't seeing images anymore when parsed via MailScanner and possibly also the recipient email address seems missing. (SpamAssassin its