On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Michael Parker wrote:
> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > We're converting a server from per user mysql bayes to sitewide bayes
> > using the "bayes_sql_override_username USERNAME" command. We want to use
> > the data for one username in the my
We're converting a server from per user mysql bayes to sitewide bayes
using the "bayes_sql_override_username USERNAME" command. We want to use
the data for one username in the mysql db already that has quite a nice
buildup of trained ham and spam.
Can we simply change the username in the mysql
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ Jêczalik wrote:
> There are many. It allows you to share data between user accounts (IMHO it
> doesn't make much sense to have separate bayes databases for each account,
> at least they are of a 'massive' sort and users are not allowed to feed
> their own
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >>> User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
> >>> (which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
> > (which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
> > It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
> >
> > user1 -> trusted_networks server
It's probably because I need sleep, but I'm confused on this scenario:
User emails from his/her dialup IP directly to trusted_networks server 1
(which is allowed by access not SMTPAUTH), which then goes to my server.
It seems this email gets flagged as DUL, PBL, etc...
user1 -> trusted_networks s
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> >>> 8) The file Botnet.variations.txt exists now with different suggested
> >>> alternative ways to do Botnet rules.
> >
> > Thanks for this. We have to use the meta method to have BOTNET not trigger
> > when other rules hit to avoid collateral damage on c
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> > 1) BOTNET_SOHO -- If the sender's (chosen from Envelope-From,
> > Return-Path, or From, in that order) mail domain (the part after the @
> > sign) resolves back to the relay's IP address, or has an MX host which
> > resolves back to the IP address, AND t
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Ray Anderson wrote:
> I use a required_score of 3 and so far have had zero positives (more
> than 3 years running).
>
> I have customers that also run 3 and have opted to have the server
> /discard/ the message (not quarantine, but /DISCARD/) if it is
> identified as spam.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
>
> > Question 1: Someone suggested that, for botnet_pass_domains, I not
> > re-invent the wheel. SA already has several whitelist options
> > (whitelist* and sare_whitelist* were specifically mentioned). They
> > suggested that I
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> >> Received: from smtp-out-4101.amazon.com (207-171-180-184.amazon.com
> >> [207.171.180.184])
> >> by XXX (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kAS2XrV04185
> >> for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:33:53 -0500
> >
> > This was ugly, but you could put "amazon
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> Great, thanks for confirming. Didn't want to score it that high until I
> knew we'd be avoiding our own users. Been running it for a few hours, got
> a few 1000 hits so far, sorted by score, and have not found a false
> positi
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
> > Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> >>> I've changed RelayChecker's name to Botnet (since that's its real
> >>> purpose: identif
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> I've changed RelayChecker's name to Botnet (since that's its real
> purpose: identify potential botnet submitted messages). Here's the 0.4
> release.
> ...
> So, let me know what you think. Let me know if you find any bugs, what
> your hit/miss/fp stats
Running openwebmail, the docs say to patch the DB_File.pm file with this
patch for OWM to work correctly:
---
Please modify /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DB_File.pm by
adding
$arg[3] = 0666 unless defined $arg[3];
before the following text (about line 247)
# make recno in Be
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > >>> Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
> > >>>
> > >>> Ran the tests and the jpg and png ones worked fine, but for the
> > >>> gif sample I received:
> > >>>
&
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> >> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> >>> Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
> >>>
> >>> Ran the tests and the jpg and png one
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, decoder wrote:
> Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> > Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
> >
> > Ran the tests and the jpg and png ones worked fine, but for the gif
> > sample I received:
> >
> > spamassassin -t > (null): EOF / r
Downloaded and installed the latest FuzzyOCR 2.1c
Ran the tests and the jpg and png ones worked fine, but for the gif sample
I received:
spamassassin -t
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Derek Harding wrote:
> rawbody INLINE_IMAGE/src\s*=\s*["']cid:/i
> describe INLINE_IMAGE Inline Images
> score INLINE_IMAGE 1.5
>
> I haven't tested this against the SA corpus so YMMV.
Anyone else find this to be a good rule to catch these image stock spams
without too
> Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > I'm having an issue with SA 3.1.0 freezing, it will run through a
> > couple of users (3 - 10) and then lockup.
> > ...
> > and it just stops there.
> > ...
> > Any one with any ideas ?
> BTW, a reboot fixed it but I still don't know what caused it.
We have seen this
21 matches
Mail list logo
