RE: Rule for this ??

2005-11-14 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
This one works like magic .. Also on the new variant which seems to have been released this weekend. body L_DRUGS11 /([CVAXP] ){5}/ header L_DRUGS12 MESSAGEID =~ /^<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/ meta L_DRUGS1 L_DRUGS11 && L_DRUGS12 score L_DRUGS1 5 describe L_DRUGS1 Strange Message-ID and Spam signature i

RE: More spam getting through

2005-11-09 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
I only got my hands on 3 of those, and they all have a very similar Message-IDs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have put the following on 2 of our SA servers, thanks for your contribution: bodyL_DRUGS11 /([CVAXP] ){5}/

Spamassassin requiring 30-40 MB per process and ghost load

2005-07-21 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
I´m just wondering if I could reduce the memory usage with some config change. I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses about 20 MB + 14MB shared Also, the load on the machine is usually 30-60% and I can't seem to pinpoint where that is coming from. It doesn't look

Excluding domains from "check_rbl_sub" checks

2005-07-12 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
Is here an easy way to exclude domains from eval:check_rbl_sub checks ? It appears that hotmail.com hits DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Because of "political reasons". (Or at least reasons I don´t completely agree with) See: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com Is there any way t

URIBL_SBL Weirdness

2005-03-09 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
Can anyone explain to me what the URIBL_SBL rule does (I.e. which list Is used) I have an email that this rule catches because of a email address inside it. The SpamAssassin report lists it as : 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: gov.ru] But no m

SAQuarantine on Sourceforge

2004-10-11 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
At last I have filled out the Sourceforge page for SAQuarantine. http://sourceforge.net/projects/saq SAQuarantine is a plugin for Postfix that picks potential Spam emails out of the mailstream and puts them in a Quarantine. Instead of being delivered straight to user´s inboxes, potential Spam

RE: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]

2004-10-06 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
Whoever configured SA for [EMAIL PROTECTED] must have either modified the points or lowered the "required" limit. I ran my_rules_du_jour this morning and the SA report in your mail, as it got to my Inbox was : X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DRUGS_ERECTILE, USER_

RE: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]

2004-10-06 Thread Rikhardur.EGILSSON
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.0 required=4.0 tests=CIALIS2 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Report: * 4.0 CIALIS2 BODY: Contains the word "cialis". This is not a SA problem, this is a "User Problem". Whoever creates a word-matching rule that, alone, gives the required number of