Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 22/01/2010 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Rick, if you've been using "users@spamassassin.apache.org" try using
*...@spamassassin.apache.org instead. If you've got en
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 22/01/2010 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Alex, if whitelist_from doesn't work, whitelist_from_rcvd won't either.
That's *more* restrictive, not less.
Rick, if you've been using "users@spamassassin.apache.org" try using
*...@spamassassin.apache.org instead. If you've got en
I belong to several mailing lists and newsgroups. Messages from one
particular list is almost always marked as spam by spamassassin. I've
tried to whitelist this group but the from header matches the address of
the original message sender, not the group address. Is there a way to
whitelist on t
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Rick Knight wrote:
I've noticed that I never get any messages with a spam score higher
than 14.9. I have suspected that SpamAssassin is dumping messages
with a score of 15 or higher. While perusing my logs today I found
this entry...
Oct 27 11:
Rick Knight wrote:
I've noticed that I never get any messages with a spam score higher
than 14.9. I have suspected that SpamAssassin is dumping messages with
a score of 15 or higher. While perusing my logs today I found this
entry...
bash-3.1# cat /var/log/maillog | grep n9RIlpTE01363
I've noticed that I never get any messages with a spam score higher than
14.9. I have suspected that SpamAssassin is dumping messages with a
score of 15 or higher. While perusing my logs today I found this entry...
bash-3.1# cat /var/log/maillog | grep n9RIlpTE013636
Oct 27 11:48:07 mail milter
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Rick Knight wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
27. Received: from public30108.xdsl.centertel.pl (HELO
marcin-8963fd6f)
(79.163.117.156)
28. by mailsrv1.trimble.co.nz with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 04:09:42
+1300
You might want to consider instituting a
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Jason Haar wrote:
I just received what appeared to be a standard "certain north american
country" pharma spam that went straight by rules I have that normally
catch it. Within Thunderbird (and any other HTML-capable MUA) it's
blatantly shouting its wares.
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
"http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt";.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later
additions.
Please to not reply to my
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:03 -0700, Rick Knight wrote:
Thanks again for putting the script up. I found the original site and
downloaded the 3.1 version. In the instructions it says "If your top 5
does not contain URIBL_BLACK, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not g
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the sa
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 19:17, R-Elists kirjoitti:
All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
would be out of business.
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
-
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 19:52, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Eduardo Casarero wrote:
2009/10/14 Rick Knight mailto:rick_kni...@rlknight.com>>
With the help of people here, I have gotten DCCIFD working. Now I
have another question. Should I use DCCIFD with DCCPROC or instead
of D
Eduardo Casarero wrote:
2009/10/14 Rick Knight <mailto:rick_kni...@rlknight.com>>
With the help of people here, I have gotten DCCIFD working. Now I
have another question. Should I use DCCIFD with DCCPROC or instead
of DCCPROC? Can they work together or does one take p
With the help of people here, I have gotten DCCIFD working. Now I have
another question. Should I use DCCIFD with DCCPROC or instead of
DCCPROC? Can they work together or does one take precedence?
Thanks,
Rick
Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Rick Knight
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:42:18 -0700
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Rick Knight
>Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:53:21 -0700
>
>Just following this thread because I recently got dcc working also. In
>m
Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Rick Knight
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:42:18 -0700
Jeff Mincy wrote:
>From: Rick Knight
>Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:53:21 -0700
>
>Just following this thread because I recently got dcc working also. In
>m
Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Rick Knight
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:53:21 -0700
Just following this thread because I recently got dcc working also. In
my case I didn't have dcc installed. After installing dcc everything
seems to be working but now I'm wondering about
Just following this thread because I recently got dcc working also. In
my case I didn't have dcc installed. After installing dcc everything
seems to be working but now I'm wondering about dccifd. On my system
dccproc is in /usr/local/bin but dccifd is in /var/dcc/libexec/. I also
have start-dc
Rick Knight wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.10.09 22:31, Rick Knight wrote:
I have installed the latest SpamAssassin (3.2.5) and Razor2. Razor2
does not appear to be working. When I check my system logs I see
this...
warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: Permission denied razor2
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 10.10.09 22:31, Rick Knight wrote:
I have installed the latest SpamAssassin (3.2.5) and Razor2. Razor2 does
not appear to be working. When I check my system logs I see this...
warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: Permission denied razor2: Can't read
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tir 13 okt 2009 11:14:32 CEST, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
/etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-agent.conf
what unix user have its homedir there ?
Thanks for the reply Benny.
No user uase it's homedir at /etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor. The user
that spamassassin run
I have installed the latest SpamAssassin (3.2.5) and Razor2. Razor2 does
not appear to be working. When I check my system logs I see this...
warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: Permission denied razor2: Can't read
conf file: /etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-agent.conf at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8
24 matches
Mail list logo
