hi list , The latest version of spamassassin on Ubuntu 22.04 does not
exist or they did not create the deb package, someone on the list who
has the deb package and wants to share it.
thnk for any help.
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
El mié., 12 feb. 2020 a las 16:28, Kevin A. McGrail
() escribió:
>
> Those are warnings to be expected as we develop the rules for our internal
> use but share them free to the world. We encapsulate some rules only useful
> in our environment and it can cause some noise if you look at debug warn
Hi list , some warning for debugging
Feb 12 10:23:37.065 [1452] dbg: config: warning: no description set
for KAM_RPTR_FAILED
Feb 12 10:23:39.113 [1452] dbg: rules: CBJ_GiveMeABreak merged
duplicates: KAM_IFRAME KAM_RAPTOR_ALTERED KAM_RPTR_FAILED
KAM_RPTR_PASSED KAM_RPTR_SUSPECT
--
rickygm
http
El jue., 6 feb. 2020 a las 16:31, John Hardin () escribió:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020, John Hardin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Amir Caspi wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan 9, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone, someone f
El sáb., 11 ene. 2020 a las 12:15, John Hardin () escribió:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Amir Caspi wrote:
>
> > On Jan 9, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone, someone from the list who can share the rpm of the
> >> latest version
El vie., 10 ene. 2020 a las 9:10, Chris Conn () escribió:
>
>
>
> On 1/9/2020 10:10 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> > SA 3.4.2 is available for Fedora, and you can build it from the SRPM pretty
> > easily for RHEL/CentOS 7 or 6 with no modifications.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> I just built SA 3.4.3 on Centos8 usi
Hi everyone, someone from the list who can share the rpm of the
latest version of spamassassin for centos 7 and 6 of x64, I want to
update to the latest version and I can't find the rpm.
thank
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
El mar., 26 mar. 2019 a las 10:39, Bowie Bailey
() escribió:
>
> >> That looks to be far too complicated for most purposes, and reading back
> >> and forth I don't think it's even intended for the standard spamd
> >> logging; it's looking at log traces from some other SA library caller
> >> entir
El lun., 25 mar. 2019 a las 14:28, Grant Taylor
() escribió:
>
> It looks like the spam-tag log may have part of what you want.
>
> awk '($7 == "spam-tag," && $11 == "Yes,"){print "From: " $8; print "To:
> " $10; print "Score: " $12}'
>
> I don't know how well it will paly when you have multiple r
El lun., 25 mar. 2019 a las 9:44, Kris Deugau () escribió:
> That looks to be far too complicated for most purposes, and reading back
> and forth I don't think it's even intended for the standard spamd
> logging; it's looking at log traces from some other SA library caller
> entirely. Can you po
Hi list , I need to do a trace of all the messages that spamassassin
cataloged as spam yesterday, I have found a bash statement but I do
not make it work, some idea that it may be failing, I am using centos
6 and spamassassin 3.4.2
grep "$(date +"%b %_d" -d "yesterday")" /var/log/maillog | grep
's
El dom., 27 ene. 2019 a las 16:45, Bill Cole
() escribió:
>
> That looks like a broken version of Net::Patricia. Line 34 of v1.15
> (March 2009) had a bug
> (https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=48234) fixed in v1.15_01
> (July 2009).
>
> Note that this is NOT a SpamAssassin bug or funct
Hi list , I am using spamassassin 3.4.2 with centos 6.10, and when
restart spamassassin it shows me the following message:
Starting spamd: Use of uninitialized value $ 3 in concatenation (.) Or
string at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/Patricia.pm line 34.
some idea that may be causing that mess
El jue., 20 dic. 2018 a las 10:36, Reindl Harald
() escribió:
>
>
> Am 20.12.18 um 17:26 schrieb Rick Gutierrez:
> >>>>> add_header all Report _REPORT_
>
> you got already the correct answer and since it is a header you need to
> look at the raw-source of the
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 8:37, Kevin A. McGrail
() escribió:
>
> On 12/16/2018 4:35 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:30:58 -0500
> > Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 17:25 RW >>
> >>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
> >>> sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> >>>
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 14:22, Benny Pedersen () escribió:
>
> why not block it with default clamav installs ?
>
> spamassassin is not a virus scanner or macro detector, i still have not
> seen rules in mimedefang or amavisd, or canit, and other tools support
> deep content scanners in spamass
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 13:40, RW () escribió:
>
> Content-Type:
> application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,
>
> doesn't contain msword|excel
Hi RW , you suggest me to make the modification?
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
Hi list , happy holidays to all, I am trying to make this rule work
that a friend wrote in github, to be able to give a high score to
documents sent from different countries, like pakistan, china or india
, I have it in my spamassassin and I do not see it working, to see if
someone on the list help
El vie., 30 nov. 2018 a las 3:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
() escribió:
> And, yes, there could be rule that catches message-id added by internal
> server. Note that:
> - Message-ID is not required (has SHOULD in RFC)
> - many mailservers add message-id if it doesn't exist.
>
> >>
> >> https://past
El mié., 28 nov. 2018 a las 19:08, Reindl Harald
() escribió:
>
> >
> > these are the files that increase the score of the rule , If I'm
> > missing someone, please someone guide me or update me if I'm doing it
> > wrong.
> >
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf
El jue., 29 nov. 2018 a las 10:18, David Jones () escribió:
>
> On 11/29/18 9:44 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> > I can't find MSGID_BELONGS_RECIPIENT in the standard distribution - I think
> > this might be because my Plugin is installed.
> >
> > Another to get into branch?
> >
>
> I think this one is w
El jue., 29 nov. 2018 a las 7:47, David Jones () escribió:
>
> Here's what my mail filters say. You can ignore the DKIM_INVALID
> because the body was intentionally modified (redacted) to post to pastbin.
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DKIM_INVALID,
> DKIM_
in days past when I start this type of messages / spammer increase the
score of this rule HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001 , add the
score to 3, but keep the default 0.001 , update my spamassassin once a
day, I'm using version 3.4.1.
these are the files that increase the score of the rule , I
El mié., 28 nov. 2018 a las 6:03, Christian Grunfeld
() escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a logcould you paste the email headers?
>
> cheers
>
I do not know if it is useful, the amavisd + spamassassin I have it in
front of the mail server.
https://pastebin.com/ktMUDLps
I appreciate any comments o
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 16:22, David Jones () escribió:
>
> Can you send a copy of the original email lightly redacted via pastebin
> so I can run it through my filters to give some pointers?
>
> --
> David Jones
Hi David , the email is very simple, but I attach it in the following link
http
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 11:54, Alan Hodgson
() escribió:
>
>
>
> Malware/phishes are usually either in an attachment or the message has a
> link. Personally I add a lot of points to either if they come through
> questionable countries. Users can dig them out of their Junk if they happen
> t
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 11:14, Alan Hodgson
() escribió:
>
> Wow, that's hard to read.
>
> It was close to being tagged because of the Pakistan relay. Just add a few
> points for Word docs and you should be good. Word docs from spammy countries
> should really get a lot of points.
Hi Alan ,
Hi , I have a situation a little complicated, I have emails from
spammers that come with the name of one of my users, but the email
address is not from my domain , they send it from a valid domain,
which complies with spf, DKIM etc etc, some idea that could help me to
adjust my spamassassin and sto
28 matches
Mail list logo
