hi list , The latest version of spamassassin on Ubuntu 22.04 does not
exist or they did not create the deb package, someone on the list who
has the deb package and wants to share it.
thnk for any help.
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
the KAM.cf
files so they will get used?
--
Rick Cooper
I.T. Manager - Bob Thomas Dealerships
Cell 260-414-8566
Fax 260-434-4400
Email rcoo...@dwford.com
It lints fine now
Rick
_
From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2021 5:43 PM
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: Lint problem with KAM.cf
I published a fix for the KAM SHORT A few hours ago. Please let me know how
it's working for you
the
name of the module should have changed to prevent exactly this.
sub short_url {
# Set by parsed_metadata
return 0;
}
which just copies the behavior of short_url_tests
Rick
_
From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 5:13 PM
To: Rick
's being merged directly into SA. If I change short_url to
short_url_tests the error goes away but I haven't run it down in the code. I
am running SA 3.4.6 and am wondering if there is a new modual for
DecodeShortURLs that I am missing somewhere?
Rick Cooper
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2021, at 13:37, Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> I was just working on some rules to catch the current crop of mal
>> formed urls used to escape detection by solutions that extract urls
>> from emails and compare them to known bad urls and I am wonder
o find out.
Rick
Hi,
Are you running sa-learn as the same user that spamd runs as ?
Running sa-learn as root won't help the scores.
Regards,
Rick
On 2020-10-11 10:03 a.m., Ramon F Herrera wrote:
*Line of Defense No. 2:*
Spamassassin. It have submitted over a thousand messages as follows:
% sa-
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 7/21/2020 9:25 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> I do strongly wonder whether this is "society" or only "people in the
>> USA".
> One data point disproves that. The SA project made the choice months
> ago inspired by a decision in the United Kingdom:
>
https://www.zdnet.com/a
mited once because we hadn't logged in for a long time. If it's legit
it should list the reason and you can go to the actual PayPal site and work
it out from there
Just saying.
Rick
_
From: Daryl Rose [mailto:rosed...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 7:
@lbutlr wrote:
> How do people deal with lists that a user subscribed to that require
> logging in to an account to unsubscribe? I seem to be seeing a lot
> more complaints from users who cannot get off lists (probably because
> they didn't realize they were creating an account for getting
> multip
Phil Reynolds wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 07:43:14 -0400
> "Rick Cooper" wrote:
>
>> I occasionally get emails warning me of bounced mail, this one
>> doesn't go through we will send a probe, yada, yada.
>>
>> They say they include the
email that would retrieve the messages that
had bounced and I have every single one of them already... Every singled
one.
What is up with that?
Rick
Brent Clark wrote:
> Hi Rick
>
> Will you be willing to share your Exim and SA rules / code?
> So that the community can benefit from your finding and work.
>
Pretty standard exim acl
The DataWhitelisted portion is calculated from several other items so that
would be up to
Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:51:36PM -0400, Rick Cooper wrote:
>> We received a couple emails yesterday that barely got caught and
>> when I looked at them they should have hit big time. As I looked it
>> would appear the body parts are encoded q
ode("UTF-7", $self->{'decoded'});
just before the decoded body is returned in Node.pm and the body rules hit
again including some quick tests I put together.
Is ignoring utf-7 intentional or is this a new spammer tactic? The actual
email messages are rendered perfectly through ou
On April 11, 2020 3:08:15 PM EDT, RW wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 19:58:02 +0100
>RW wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The first one was cited as a format used in forwarded ham. The other
>> two are common in spam.
>>
>> The point of this spamming technique is that many clients show only
>> the display name i
ot;m...@mine.com
" vs "Fname Lname (va...@mine.com) (give or
take the parenthesis).
Because the second one is more commonalty used for valid purposes (hence
needing the ability to whitelist and address or domain). The first example I
have never seen used in a legit fashion myself. So if it hits
The first rule that is a high hit, well above threshold and the second rule
is bypassed (no double dip),
Hit the second rule and it's a moderate bump.
Rick
that do this.
I could of course add a whitelist of sorts but I prefer to bump the score a
bit, enough to tag as low scoring spam.
For detecting possible fraud addresses involving our own people I wrote a
backend look up for exim that looks at any name like "Rick Cooper" and
compares th
El mié., 12 feb. 2020 a las 16:28, Kevin A. McGrail
() escribió:
>
> Those are warnings to be expected as we develop the rules for our internal
> use but share them free to the world. We encapsulate some rules only useful
> in our environment and it can cause some noise if you look at debug warn
Hi list , some warning for debugging
Feb 12 10:23:37.065 [1452] dbg: config: warning: no description set
for KAM_RPTR_FAILED
Feb 12 10:23:39.113 [1452] dbg: rules: CBJ_GiveMeABreak merged
duplicates: KAM_IFRAME KAM_RAPTOR_ALTERED KAM_RPTR_FAILED
KAM_RPTR_PASSED KAM_RPTR_SUSPECT
--
rickygm
http
El jue., 6 feb. 2020 a las 16:31, John Hardin () escribió:
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020, John Hardin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Amir Caspi wrote:
> >
> >> On Jan 9, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone, someone f
changed to comply with the stated 5.8.8 above?
I know to fix this before running make test, but the errors this produces
during make test could be quite confusing if you just ran into it.
Rick
El sáb., 11 ene. 2020 a las 12:15, John Hardin () escribió:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Amir Caspi wrote:
>
> > On Jan 9, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone, someone from the list who can share the rpm of the
> >> latest version
El vie., 10 ene. 2020 a las 9:10, Chris Conn () escribió:
>
>
>
> On 1/9/2020 10:10 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> > SA 3.4.2 is available for Fedora, and you can build it from the SRPM pretty
> > easily for RHEL/CentOS 7 or 6 with no modifications.
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> I just built SA 3.4.3 on Centos8 usi
Hi everyone, someone from the list who can share the rpm of the
latest version of spamassassin for centos 7 and 6 of x64, I want to
update to the latest version and I can't find the rpm.
thank
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
Hi,
For the good of your blood pressure, just ignore h.rei...@thelounge.net
I've plonked every thing from him into /dev/null so long ago I can't
remember when I did it.
Why he's still allowed to post here is beyond me.
Regards,
Rick
On 2019-11-22 7:20 p.m., Jerry Malcol
"Persons Name "
>
> Is there a way I can mark From: that has 2 email addresses in it as
> spam? Pro's Cons?
>
> Phil
From: =~ /^.*?<.+?\@.+?>.*?<.+\@.+?>/g
Can't imagine the circumstance where such a from: format would be required
Rick
El mar., 26 mar. 2019 a las 10:39, Bowie Bailey
() escribió:
>
> >> That looks to be far too complicated for most purposes, and reading back
> >> and forth I don't think it's even intended for the standard spamd
> >> logging; it's looking at log traces from some other SA library caller
> >> entir
El lun., 25 mar. 2019 a las 14:28, Grant Taylor
() escribió:
>
> It looks like the spam-tag log may have part of what you want.
>
> awk '($7 == "spam-tag," && $11 == "Yes,"){print "From: " $8; print "To:
> " $10; print "Score: " $12}'
>
> I don't know how well it will paly when you have multiple r
El lun., 25 mar. 2019 a las 9:44, Kris Deugau () escribió:
> That looks to be far too complicated for most purposes, and reading back
> and forth I don't think it's even intended for the standard spamd
> logging; it's looking at log traces from some other SA library caller
> entirely. Can you po
Hi list , I need to do a trace of all the messages that spamassassin
cataloged as spam yesterday, I have found a bash statement but I do
not make it work, some idea that it may be failing, I am using centos
6 and spamassassin 3.4.2
grep "$(date +"%b %_d" -d "yesterday")" /var/log/maillog | grep
's
El dom., 27 ene. 2019 a las 16:45, Bill Cole
() escribió:
>
> That looks like a broken version of Net::Patricia. Line 34 of v1.15
> (March 2009) had a bug
> (https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=48234) fixed in v1.15_01
> (July 2009).
>
> Note that this is NOT a SpamAssassin bug or funct
Hi list , I am using spamassassin 3.4.2 with centos 6.10, and when
restart spamassassin it shows me the following message:
Starting spamd: Use of uninitialized value $ 3 in concatenation (.) Or
string at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/Patricia.pm line 34.
some idea that may be causing that mess
gt;> try Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing
>>
>> Cheers
>> Giovanni
>
> man Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing
> to be precise.
>Giovanni
Something that isn't answered in the docs is the default score and I am
wondering if SA has to be restarted after each update of the data or does it
reread each time the plugin is called
Rick Cooper
On 2018-12-24 12:39 p.m., Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2018-12-23 17:02, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'm just going to jump in here and mention that I train my bayes in SA
and in Thunderbird email client.
Thunderbird catches 99%+ and SA catches under 60% with the same
training data.
Have you
to SA rejecting emails.
Regards,
Rick
El jue., 20 dic. 2018 a las 10:36, Reindl Harald
() escribió:
>
>
> Am 20.12.18 um 17:26 schrieb Rick Gutierrez:
> >>>>> add_header all Report _REPORT_
>
> you got already the correct answer and since it is a header you need to
> look at the raw-source of the
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 8:37, Kevin A. McGrail
() escribió:
>
> On 12/16/2018 4:35 PM, RW wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:30:58 -0500
> > Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 17:25 RW >>
> >>> On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:26:17 +0100
> >>> sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> >>>
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 14:22, Benny Pedersen () escribió:
>
> why not block it with default clamav installs ?
>
> spamassassin is not a virus scanner or macro detector, i still have not
> seen rules in mimedefang or amavisd, or canit, and other tools support
> deep content scanners in spamass
El lun., 17 dic. 2018 a las 13:40, RW () escribió:
>
> Content-Type:
> application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,
>
> doesn't contain msword|excel
Hi RW , you suggest me to make the modification?
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
Hi list , happy holidays to all, I am trying to make this rule work
that a friend wrote in github, to be able to give a high score to
documents sent from different countries, like pakistan, china or india
, I have it in my spamassassin and I do not see it working, to see if
someone on the list help
El vie., 30 nov. 2018 a las 3:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
() escribió:
> And, yes, there could be rule that catches message-id added by internal
> server. Note that:
> - Message-ID is not required (has SHOULD in RFC)
> - many mailservers add message-id if it doesn't exist.
>
> >>
> >> https://past
El mié., 28 nov. 2018 a las 19:08, Reindl Harald
() escribió:
>
> >
> > these are the files that increase the score of the rule , If I'm
> > missing someone, please someone guide me or update me if I'm doing it
> > wrong.
> >
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf
El jue., 29 nov. 2018 a las 10:18, David Jones () escribió:
>
> On 11/29/18 9:44 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
> > I can't find MSGID_BELONGS_RECIPIENT in the standard distribution - I think
> > this might be because my Plugin is installed.
> >
> > Another to get into branch?
> >
>
> I think this one is w
El jue., 29 nov. 2018 a las 7:47, David Jones () escribió:
>
> Here's what my mail filters say. You can ignore the DKIM_INVALID
> because the body was intentionally modified (redacted) to post to pastbin.
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DKIM_INVALID,
> DKIM_
in days past when I start this type of messages / spammer increase the
score of this rule HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001 , add the
score to 3, but keep the default 0.001 , update my spamassassin once a
day, I'm using version 3.4.1.
these are the files that increase the score of the rule , I
El mié., 28 nov. 2018 a las 6:03, Christian Grunfeld
() escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a logcould you paste the email headers?
>
> cheers
>
I do not know if it is useful, the amavisd + spamassassin I have it in
front of the mail server.
https://pastebin.com/ktMUDLps
I appreciate any comments o
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 16:22, David Jones () escribió:
>
> Can you send a copy of the original email lightly redacted via pastebin
> so I can run it through my filters to give some pointers?
>
> --
> David Jones
Hi David , the email is very simple, but I attach it in the following link
http
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 11:54, Alan Hodgson
() escribió:
>
>
>
> Malware/phishes are usually either in an attachment or the message has a
> link. Personally I add a lot of points to either if they come through
> questionable countries. Users can dig them out of their Junk if they happen
> t
El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 11:14, Alan Hodgson
() escribió:
>
> Wow, that's hard to read.
>
> It was close to being tagged because of the Pakistan relay. Just add a few
> points for Word docs and you should be good. Word docs from spammy countries
> should really get a lot of points.
Hi Alan ,
Hi , I have a situation a little complicated, I have emails from
spammers that come with the name of one of my users, but the email
address is not from my domain , they send it from a valid domain,
which complies with spf, DKIM etc etc, some idea that could help me to
adjust my spamassassin and sto
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2017, at 16:54, Rick wrote:
>
>> Everything having to do with DNS has gone terribly wrong since the
>> update. Spamd cannot do anything at all with DNS even though it's a
>> local caching NS and EVERTHING else is resolving just fine. It
Everything having to do with DNS has gone terribly wrong since the update.
Spamd cannot do anything at all with DNS even though it's a local caching NS
and EVERTHING else is resolving just fine. It does pull the name server
entry correctly but it resolves nothng. If I force it use DNS all queries
Karol Augustin wrote:
> On 07/10/16 03:51, Rick Cooper wrote:
>> So how do I dump the ~/ disk file for the DB . The txrep.cf file :
>>
>> user_awl_dsn DBI:mysql:SpamAssassin:127.0.0.1
>> user_awl_sql_username CorrectUser
>> user_awl_sql_password CorrectPas
DB . The txrep.cf file :
user_awl_dsn DBI:mysql:SpamAssassin:127.0.0.1
user_awl_sql_username CorrectUser
user_awl_sql_password CorrectPassword
user_awl_sql_table txrep
use_txrep 1
txrep_track_messages 1
Thanks for any help,
Rick
irst
issue resolved and can start training myself?
Here is a pastebin.com link to an example uncaught spam message. SA
scored it a 4.7. http://pastebin.com/T1CfVgP4
Hi,
We are going to need the full headers, not just the email body.
Regards,
Rick
On 2016-05-20 11:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.05.2016 um 16:50 schrieb Rick Macdougall:
On 2016-05-20 10:36 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Second, the foxhole_js database is what you're looking for
Paul
On 20/05/16 13:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 20.05.2016 um 13:07 schrieb Dianne Skoll
24631.XlsHeur.UNOFFICIAL 623
Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.Auto.87287f.UNOFFICIAL 414
winnow.spam.ts.xmailer.2.UNOFFICIAL 341
Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.Auto.a33ccf.UNOFFICIAL 283
Sanesecurity.Jurlbl.Auto.aaeaca.UNOFFICIAL 157
Regards,
Rick
On 2015-12-09 11:58 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 12/09/15 05:50, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
The messages it flags are messages that would have been caught without
it. About 2% of messages it flags are not seen by any other markers.
Regards,
Rick
Any false positives?
I suppose catching
On 2015-12-08 9:46 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm confused. Are you saying it's catching the same spam messages you
about the same amount?
If they are new messages then it's doing well.
On 12/08/15 12:43, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Quick and dirty look.
grep CTYME_IXHASH /var/lo
.
Regards,
Rick
On 2015-12-08 3:32 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to get a sense from everyone how well it works. Is it hitting
spam other tests aren't hitting? Are there false positives?
On 12/08/15 05:57, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.12.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alex:
On Sun, Dec 6,
Hi,
That information should be in the spamd log file.
I don't know which Toaster you are using but mine is in
/var/log/spamd/current
Regards,
Rick
On 9/17/2015 3:27 PM, Rajesh M wrote:
hi
we are using qmailtoaster with spamassassin
currently the spamassasin log details show as suc
For some reason,
whitelist_from *@*.usps.gov
whitelist_from *@*.usps.com
doesn't work on the header below. Anyone spot something that I missed?
Received: from mailcentral12.srvs.usps.gov ([56.0.143.18]:47963
helo=gk-c18-email.usps.gov)
by coeus.lunarmania.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES
2015 11:23:33 -0700
Rick Hantz \(TirNanOg\) wrote:
>
> However, none of the whitelist seems to get processed. Mail that
> should have a high negative number doesn't and ends up in the spam
> folder.
>
> whitelist_from 23andme.com
> ...
> whitelist_from *.aarp
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
whitelist_from mailto:*@e.washingtonpost.com
Do I also need
whitelist_from mailto:*@*.sailthru.com ?
Appreciate all the help.
-RickH
Return-path:
Envelope-to: rickhan!!tirna
obytel.com
whitelist_from boldprogressives.org
whitelist_from *.care2.com
whitelist_from *.charbroil.com
whitelist_from cnet.online.com
whitelist_from *.consumerlab.com
whitelist_from *.costco.com
whitel
.
Any ideas or workarounds?
Thanks,
Rick
Hi,
First HPUX 900 certified admin in Canada circa 1982. I too remember those days.
Regards,
Rick
PS. Still under 50 :)
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 7:37 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:06 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> Not q
Hi,
FTR = for the record as far as I know.
Regards,
Rick
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:51 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 02/05/2015 11:11 AM, Axb wrote:
>>
>> adding FTR:
>
> Can you explain FTR?
>
>> Received: from [238.10.216
On 2014-09-12 1:24 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 15:26 schrieb Giles Coochey:
On 12/09/2014 13:47, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I have used imap-sa-learn.pl for years. Works great.
Google imap-sa-learn.pl to get the perl source code
years. Works great.
Google imap-sa-learn.pl to get the perl source code.
Regards,
Rick
On 2014-07-23 3:05 PM, Asai wrote:
Hi,
I'm also not seeing any BAYES results in the Spam Status. Are you
sure BAYES is turned on ?
Regards,
Rick
That's a good question. As far as I can tell, it is. But is there a way
to get a config dump from the command line?
I have a fe
S results in the Spam Status. Are you sure
BAYES is turned on ?
Regards,
Rick
Err,
I have received automated emails from Mark's service multiple times about
compromised users.
He and his services are definitely white hat, and have helped us knock infected
users off line.
Not sure what your problem is.
Regards,
Rick
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 6, 2014, at
t was legit but
only had one link, I believe the OP wants to match a body that is blank
except for a single url and I found no way to do that without writing a
custom plugin
Rick
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> This is what I was wondering. We don't want to have to run a
> computationally-expensive body rule unless we need to. No choice
> though, I guess. Thanks for your help!
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
>> Sent: Monday, June
an ISP.
regards,
Rick
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-05-16, at 8:02 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Running a 4 server cluster of SA servers with MySQL running on one. 2
>> running auto learn and the other two just
>> doing queries. Looks like I average about 6300 queries a mi
to
hear other reports.
Regards,
Rick
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-05-16, at 6:59 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> In the past I have never managed to get bayes to work with MySQL in a
> reliable way. Even running in ram it would die of some sort of corruption
> after a few hours.
>
>
Hello,
I was curious if somebody out there publishes a Spamassassin Bayes SPAM/HAM
data base that someone could buy or subscribe to? If so, please provide
details if known.
Thanks,
Rick
the email and select the "Move"
option, it also has a "Copy to Folder" option. Can we just "copy to Folder"
the good emails to the "ham" IMAP email user?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Monda
27;m reluctant to make
some big email switch from POP to IMAP, as it appears you need lots of
storage on the email server for that (is that true?). Any suggestions? We
use the Bynari Insight Server, and their support is a bit limited on this
older product.
Thanks!
Rick
-Original Message--
Hello,
I have spamassassin available for use in a POP environment with Outlook
2010. We don't use IMAP. How would someone recommend getting the SPAM and
HAM information to sa-learn?
Thanks,
Rick
ar. I also find that there
are *several* common traits within the body of the web pages, for instance a
fox news copyright, specific class names and links names such as 'Home' (remove the
--)
If anyone has a chance to verify this, especially the 404 without a
user-agent string I would think something could easily be done with a custom
plug-in to detect that. Oh, and they all do a 301 or 302 redirect at the
intial request
Rick
ehow to teach SA to get configs from a "dummy" dir. How can I do
that? is only doable with patches? of course, looking at them would be
awesome :)
Cheers,
Hi,
Storing the user prefs in sql would make it easy to access. Just
depends on how the users access their prefs.
Regards,
Rick
1.4% hotmail.com
Interesting. Here, it's hotmail servers sending over 57% of the spam.
I wonder if they are so low on that list because the list the actual
senders IP as the origination point.
Regards,
Rick
week.
apologies for any inconvenience and poke me if you have questions or
suggestions for the service.
best,
-rick
;t find the server at devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net.
Regards,
Rick
.
If you want to scan authenticated users you will need to recompile
simscan adding the --enable-spam-auth-user=y configure value.
You can find your old configure options in config.log and then just add
the --enable-spam-auth-user=y at the end.
Regards,
Rick
On 27/07/2010 1:21 PM, Suhag P Desai wrote:
Thanks Rick,
Now my tcp.smtp file looks like below
[r...@spd tcprules.d]# cat tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/q
mail/control/domainkeys/%/private"
192.168.10.:allow,R
an"
:allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="5",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private"
Hi,
You need a .QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan" on the last allow line
to enable simscan on incoming mail.
Regards,
Rick
here currently scanning their outgoing mail with SA? Good
results? Bad results?
Hi,
We, a mid sized ISP, virus scan all outgoing mail and SA all non AUTH'd
outgoing mail.
Just FYI.
Regards,
Rick
ons ? Perhaps you have disabled network tests.
Regards,
Rick
estigation.
Regards,
Rick
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers
vance.
Rick
Original Message
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:m...@perkel.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:11 PM
To: Rick Cooper
Cc: 'ram'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster
> Rick Cooper wrote:
>>
>> >>> The anti-S
>>> From: Marc Perkel [mailto:m...@perkel.com] Sent: Thursday, February
>>> 25, 2010 12:30 PM To: ram Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject:
>>> Re: Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster
>>> ram wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 18:33 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>> Jeff Koch wro
il, period. In my case if you break the helo with my name
rule
You are instantly added to the firewall for a week.
Rick
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
d, if needed, run sa-compile.
Rick
1 - 100 of 506 matches
Mail list logo
