Re: SPF plugin per-user?

This can be done for a particular user? Ricardo - Original Message - From: "RW" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: Re: SPF plugin per-user? On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0700 "Ricardo Kleemann" wrote: Hi, Is there a user preference to disabl

SPF plugin per-user?

Hi, Is there a user preference to disable SPF in SA for some users and enable for others? Thanks Ricardo

Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00

Thank you. - Original Message - From: "Kai Schaetzl" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:10 AM Subject: Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00 Ricardo Kleemann wrote on Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:31:33 -0700: A question about AWL... addresses that get into AWL for score averaging, if

Re: Spam with AWL and Bayes00

Hello John, Q1: how did these addresses (which are all pretty obviously spam and none of which are in our own domain) get into the AWL to begin with? They came in and were delivered. You don't know what AWL thinks about them. Why do you think it should only take mail from your domain? Chris

does SBL/XBL have a plugin?

Are SBL/XBL tests automatically enabled or is there a plugin I need to enable? Thanks Ricardo

how to manage AWL?

Hi, I have some messages that are reporting AWL score but I'd like to remove that sender from the AWL. How can I do that? Thanks Ricardo

not able to get pyzor working

Hi, I'm running SA on Ubuntu 8.04 and when I enable pyzor it gets an internal error. Here's my SA version: SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4 running on Perl 5.8.8 My mail log simply shows this for pyzor: pyzor: check failed: internal error I'm able to ping pyzor: pyzor ping public.pyzor.org:2

Re: Last-5-percent tuning

Hi, > Do you use any MTA-level DNSBLs? No. If you have ample of ressources you can do this. If you are getting tenthousands of mails you can't (or won't). We reject about 90% of the spam at MTA. That's mostly Bot spam. Why should we burn good ressources for that stuff? Interestingly, that al

help with scores

Hi, I made some changes to the scores of a few rules and included in my local.cf file. For example: score URIBL_BLACK 0 2.5 0 2.0 # n=0 n=2 score BAYES_99 0 0 4.0 4.0 However, I'm getting messages that hit both URIBL_BLACK and BAYES_99 and have a score of 6.0. How can that be (I would expect

not seeing any advantage to sa-learn?

Hi, I have SA working very well for me, but there are still a few cases of spam that are very persistent, I still get a considerable amount of spam that SA doesn't catch. However, what is annoying is that no matter how much I feed through sa-learn, the SA score doesn't change much. I created