Re: SHTML file extension handling?

2024-03-12 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Hi! Loads of phishing is done that way. Having a shtml with a post command to whatever they want from you… usually banking/dhl … With kind regards, Raymond Dijkxhoorn > Op 12 mrt 2024 om 20:37 heeft Jared Hall via users > het volgende geschreven: > > Is there a use case for emailing .shtm

Re: URIDNSBL full message checking

2023-02-06 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Hello Michael, No. Which is fine, because there are usually no URIs in headers, and when there are, they are likely to be standard List-* headers, which are unlikely to be useful. Dont agree with that. We see many usecases for header checks... We see many spams with a from domain inside SURBL

Re: sharepoint phish routed through sharepointonline/outlook

2023-01-17 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Hi! Yes, I am running SA4 and have been for probably more than a year. What am I doing wrong that RBL checks wouldn't be checking the FQDN? Could be several reasons but will contact you offlist. uniabujaedung-my[.]sharepoint[.]com[.]multi[.]surbl[.]org has address 127.0.0.64 Meaning its l

Re: sharepoint phish routed through sharepointonline/outlook

2023-01-17 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Hello All, RBL checks for FQDN not just domains would be a good idea... >X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200 required=5 >tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, >DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.1, FMBLA_HELO_OUTMX=-0.01, >FMBLA_RDNS_OUTMX=-0.0

Re: phishtank api usage from spamassassin ?

2022-08-25 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
legit subdomains you definately don’t want to block. With kind regards, Raymond Dijkxhoorn > Op 26 aug. 2022 om 00:40 heeft Benny Pedersen het volgende > geschreven: > > Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users skrev den 2022-08-25 23:45: >> Benny, >> Sorry for the top p

Re: phishtank api usage from spamassassin ?

2022-08-25 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Benny, It’s not a redirector in that sense. The 2ld is correct and SHOULD be used. It’s abused subdomains of page.link that we see and list. I don’t see samples of the base domain beeing used and abused as a redirector. Could it be that that one is added mistakenly? With the 2ld listing S

Re: phishtank api usage from spamassassin ?

2022-08-25 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn via users
Benny, Sorry for the top posting. SURBL doesn’t list that base domain. And please check on the SURBL page not on some third party site that might even be acl’ed. https://www.surbl.org/surbl-analysis page.link is NOT listed SURBL lists the subdomains, and we list many of them. It’s a firebase