Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
Does this mean that I need to make a separate installation of razor
using the instructions at
http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/doc.php?type=text&name=INSTALL ? The
spamassassin spam reporting docs
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
authentication at
What can I do to fix it?
Read the Razor docs. In this case, SA is telling you that Razor requires you
to have
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason why it is ALL_TRUSTED
I think I can:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 22:45:07 +0100
Received: from 82-35-6-77.cable.ubr01.hari.blueyonder.co.uk
(@
I have what appears to be a fully functional spamassassin 3.0.3 set up
with all network tests working. However,
spamassassin -r samplespam.txt
gives me
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
authentication at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/R
I have a spam message (attached below) which is causing all kinds of
problems. The first is that the score is
(command "spamassassin spam.txt")
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.3
I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason
Good advice. You might also like to gently remind the user that spam is
essentially an attack by a malicious third party and that you are doing
your best to defend him. It is NOT a bug in the computer system as I
imagine the user likes to think it is.
Raphael
Gray, Richard wrote:
If you felt s
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Just to reply to my own message.
It is seems to make a crucial difference which order to run the spam
and ham tests in! I reran the spam test and it now says I have
Typo:
"spam test" above should be "sa-learn command for the spam folder"
(from
0 non-token data: nham
[...]
So the number of spam has increased to roughly what it should be but the
number of ham has decreased by 1000!
Can anyone explain this? It looks like a bug as surely the order of
execution shouldn't matter?!
Raphael
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Hi,
I am trying t
Hi,
I am trying to set up Bayes classifying for the first time using
sa-learn. It looks like it is working but doesn't actually seem to
be... Here is the output
[raph]$ sa-learn --showdots --mbox --spam
.thunderbird/gmnjx6hf.default/Mail/mail.plus.net/Junk
.
