Am 11.02.2010 22:37, schrieb Spiro Harvey:
> We're getting a boatload of To and From addresses starting with pipe
> characters on one of our clients' mailservers. The messages themselves
> don't appear particularly malicious -- the ones we've seen are just
> pill spam -- but there are craploads of
Am 30.01.2010 16:48, schrieb Jeff Mincy:
>From: K�rlis Repsons
>Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:16 +
>
>On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
>> Retrain the message correctly in Bayes. Bayes will catch on to this
>> after a few times. The subject alone
Am 29.01.2010 19:56, schrieb tonjg:
>
> raq550 running strongbolt 2, spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.5-1.el4
> I get the following error when trying to do a an sa-learn command:
> bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Mail
> /SpamAssassin/BayesS
Am 22.01.2010 21:40, schrieb Alex:
> Hi,
>
>> if you do not use MySQL for bayes, migrate.
>
> How do you determine whether the administrative overhead (downtime for
> maintenance, etc) is necessary or a simple periodic rsync would do the
> trick?
>
> How long can the bayes databases be out of sy
Am 22.01.2010 18:31, schrieb d.h...@yournetplus.com:
> Quoting LuKreme :
>
>> On 22-Jan-2010, at 02:07, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
>>> bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
>>> bayes_sql_dsn DBI:mysql:mailscanner::3306
>>> bay
Am 22.01.2010 09:41, schrieb Stephane MAGAND:
> Hello,
>
> In a previous post, i have request a information, can i use one
> central bayes database
> for a lot of SpamAssassin Server.
>
> I have received a answer: Yes
>
> But what is the process ?
>
> for > one spamassassin, we use obligatory a
I could find your IP (82.113.106.21) on these lists :
b.barracudacentral.org 127.0.0.2
bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2
blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
82.113.106.21.misc.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com. 127.0.0.9
blocked.secnap.net 127.0.0.2
cbl.abuseat.org 127.0.0.2
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net 127.0
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:07 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
Is anyone else seeing an influx of spam with a zip attachment
balancechecker.zip?
This contains a windows executable, balancechecker.exe, which appears to
be
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb:
Is anyone else seeing an influx of spam with a zip attachment
balancechecker.zip?
This contains a windows executable, balancechecker.exe, which appears to
be testing clean with clam and others.
I'm inclined to think it's *not* clean and is viral.
EXAMPLE
http://
Hi,
AFAIK this is just coincidence. I don't have any accounts on such
platforms but I also receive mails for passwort requests for Facebook,
MySpace .
Cheers
Ralph
twofers schrieb:
This may not be an exact Spamassassin type question, but something happened to
me recently concerning s
John Hardin schrieb:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, rpc1 wrote:
My spamassassin plug doesn't check mail where sender address and receiver
address are equal. Like this
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.2
tests=DNSBL_RELAYS.ORDB.ORG: 5.00,DNSBL_BL.SPAMCOP.NET:
5.00,DNSBL_SBL-XBL
Chris schrieb:
http://pastebin.com/m5e126ea
This came to one of my address where what I usually get is 99% spam and
was scored as ham, no matter what I've done I can't get it to score the
minimum +5 points. After learning it as spam with sa-learn and using
spamassassin -r to report to razor/pyzo
no rules
needed, I only need a newsreader (Thunderbird does this job qute good
for me).
Not everything that looks old fashioned is less comfortable than a
teletubby webinterface ;-)
Just to add my 2cents.
Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann
13 matches
Mail list logo
