n the logging.
Thank you all for the information.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Wed, April 22, 2009 12:39, R.Smits wrote:
>> We sometimes have in our loggin for spamassassin the following entry :
>> mail_id: 3pCjeOEN7rlE, Hits: -, size: 6408, queued_as: 6B9B150489, 185 ms
>>
>&
Hello,
We sometimes have in our loggin for spamassassin the following entry :
mail_id: 3pCjeOEN7rlE, Hits: -, size: 6408, queued_as: 6B9B150489, 185 ms
This seems normal, but there are some blacklisted url's in this message,
so it seems that spamassassin is "giving up" because it does not know
t
Thank you,
It works perfect
Greetings... Richard
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 11:46 +0100, R.Smits wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have searched the archives, but not found a clear answer to this...
>> maybe someone can give me a hint.
>>
>&
Hello,
I have searched the archives, but not found a clear answer to this...
maybe someone can give me a hint.
I have a few strings that i want to use with a meta rule.
example :
---
body __WORD_01 /string1/
body __WORD_02 /string2/
body __WORD_03 /string3/
body __WORD_04 /string4/i
bod
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 12/12/2008 11:54 AM, R.Smits wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
>>
>> header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
>> header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
>> meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01
Hello,
Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01 && __RULE2_02)
score RULE03 0.01
So can the : !~ be used in a header rule ?
I have never tried it before
Greetings ... Rich
Hi,
We have exacly the same issue over here. I am very interested in a
solution. If i look at the maillog file, I don't see a MY_SERVERS_FOUND
triggered anywhere ?
Greetings... Richard
JP Kelly wrote:
> yay i finally had the pleasure of getting joe jobbed!
>
> so i am looking at vbounce. i thin
Hello,
Is there something I can do that our company addresses cannot be used
for sending spam ? Is DKIM an answer ?
A lot of our users get "delivery failed" messages. So a spammer is
sending spam with our addresses :-(
A difficult problem I think ?
Greetings... Richard Smits
Forget it
I have just discovered DCC .
Looks a lot better :-)
Sorry i've asked.
Greetings...
R.Smits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
>
> Is anyone using pyzor ?
>
> We are looking at these add-ons for
Hello,
Has anyone got experience with the spamassasin plugin from cloudmark ?
Is anyone using pyzor ?
We are looking at these add-ons for spamasssassin. Pyzor looks old...
(last version from 2002)
Greetings... Richard Smits
Technical University Delft
Hello,
I have tried to change the score for : DOS_OE_TO_MX because we have a
lot of false positives with this rule.
It gives 2.75 points.
This is defined in the /var/lib/spamassassin/etc directory.
I have put the usual score statement in the local.cf , but it does not
work ? With the other r
Hello,
We have a problem that is very annoying. Let me explain it.
Our organisation is using spamassassin with the check for RCVD_IN_PBL.
Now if one of our users is using webmail (exchange) and sends an email
outside the organisation, it gets points for this. (If their provider is
on the PBL)
In
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Quoting Richard Smits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Thanks for all the advice.. I think we will be using spamhaus. I am
>> running a test and it blocks a lot of spam. Currently I use the
>> sbl.spamhaus and pbl.spamhaus
>> Is this wise, or should I also use the xbl and switch to zen
Hello,
Which spam blacklists do you use in your MTA config. (postfix)
smptd_client_restrictions
Currently we only use : reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
We let spamassassin fight the rest of the spam. But the load of spam is
getting to high for our organisation. Wich list is safe enough to block
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Tarak Ranjan wrote:
>> greetings,
>> i'm getting pdf attached spam. please help me stop that using
>> spamassassin...
>>
>> Horacio_FILE_506292_6906.pdf
>>
>> /tarak
>>
>>
> The PDFInfo plugin from rulesemporium is designed for this kind of thing.
>
> http://www.rulesemp
Hello,
On the fuzzyocr site I see 3.5.1 version is not SA 3.2.X compatible ? Is
this true, or can I safely ignore :-)
We have an older server with SA 3.2.0 and Fuzzyocr 2.3b and it works.
Greetings.. Richard
16 matches
Mail list logo