Sorry, yeah - all BAYES rules were gone after --clear. When I trained it
with another fresh 1000 spam and ham it started again with BAYES_00. I will
need to go through the spam and ham again
On 11 September 2015 at 23:26, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:25:46 +0100
> Peter Kelly
DNS nameserver for the RELAY and TRUSTED problem.
On 11 September 2015 at 21:58, Bill Cole <
sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2015, at 6:12, Peter Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 sc
http://pastebin.com/8eM88hX2
On 11 September 2015 at 13:08, Axb wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 01:17 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
>
>> - How are you using SA?
>> (pls specify: amavis, MIMEDefang, a milter, Mailscanner, procmail,
>> Fuglu, etc, etc)
>>
>> Just spamassassin on
.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote:
> > On 09/11/2015 01:17 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
>
> > > - Are you using a local, non forwarding, DNS resolver/caching server ?
> > >
> > > No
>
> > > - Are you handling mail for a company, personal email, ISP, one domain,
wrote:
> Peter Kelly skrev den 2015-09-11 12:12:
>
> Any help greatly appreciated,
>>
>
> google URIBL_BLOCKED
>
> https://www.google.dk/search?q=uribl_blcoked
>
> http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
>
> plenty of other links to see how and why
>
> do you m
