Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check (with the
onf
Am I missing something? Is this correct?
From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks.
Thanks in advance.
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Ke
ttler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
To answer your questions:
1. I ran spa
> Paul Wetter wrote:
>> Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
>> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
>>
>>
>> spamassassin -t gives me this:
>>
>> Content analysis d
us XBL
[81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
They are very different!
Where do we go from here?
Thanks again!!
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Wetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
I forgot to note that I have flagged 50+ of
these similar emails. It seems to me that something is not working
correctly.
- Original Message -
From:
Paul
Wetter
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:30
PM
Subject: Messages Not
For the last week now I have been receiving
several very similar messages that are spam and not being detected as
spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in
not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes
detection? Is there any way to log wha
