On Jan 24, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:41:47PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
-D is debug, it's not related to logging level (there is no "verbose
loggi
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to manually munging 10_misc.cf.
On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:27:35PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Does sp
On Jan 24, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2005 01:19:28 PM:
> Hi All--
>
> I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
> software, running on the system..." prea
Hi All--
I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview from
my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
I have in local.cf:
report_safe 0
remove_header all Report
add_header all Report score=_SCORE_ tests=_TEST
On Jan 24, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Damir Cosic wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3%
of
total spam that was being sent to my address. I use it on my Mandrake
10
workstation by
On Jan 24, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Damir Cosic wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3%
of
total spam that was being sent to my address. I use it on my Mandrake
10
workstation by
Hi All--
I've upgraded SA from 2.63 to 3.0.2 and I've noticed a big difference
in my bayes scores. Under 2.63 a 99% bayes probability would give me a
score of 5.4, now I get only 1.9:
Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
