Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus?

2022-05-07 Thread Paul Pace
On 2022-05-07 10:37, Matija Nalis wrote: On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 09:35:31AM -0700, Paul Pace wrote: On 2022-05-07 07:53, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote: > > * 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL > >

Re: Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus?

2022-05-07 Thread Paul Pace
On 2022-05-07 07:53, Benny Pedersen wrote: On 2022-05-07 16:42, Paul Pace wrote: I have set up SpamAssassin with the following in /etc/spamassassin/mycustomscores.cf: * 10 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL * blocklist *

Spamhaus spurious positives - how does SpamAssassin check Spamhaus?

2022-05-07 Thread Paul Pace
I have set up SpamAssassin with the following in /etc/spamassassin/mycustomscores.cf: score RCVD_IN_SBL 10.0 score RCVD_IN_XBL 10.0 score RCVD_IN_PBL 10.0 score RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS 10.0 score URIBL_SBL 10.0 score URIBL_CSS 10.0 score URIBL_CSS_A 10.0 score U

Declare as spam with learning for failed DMARC/SPF

2020-05-14 Thread Paul Pace
Hello, I have Ubuntu 18.04, Postfix 3.3, OpenDMARC 1.3.2, OpenDKIM 2.11, Spamassassin 3.4.2, and Dovecot 2.2. I am trying to achieve a configuration where: If there is a DMARC test and it fails, then send to spam directory. If there is no DMARC test and there is an SPF test and it fails, sen