On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:23:51 -0500, John Rudd wrote:
How's it working for you, so far?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:12, Paul Griffith wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:28:42 -0500, si wrote:
Guys,
I'm sure you're as sad as I am re- temporary suspension of the
brilliant
serv
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:28:42 -0500, si wrote:
Guys,
I'm sure you're as sad as I am re- temporary suspension of the brilliant
services offered by Steve Basford and is helpers at Sane Security. In a
sick kind of way, the 'bad guys' are acknowledging the work these guys
have done by DOSing
Greetings,
Anyone have any issues getting Jim Mason's sought rules updated from
yerp.org? I am running SA 3.0.25 and the last successful update was Nov.
26, 2008. It looks like some bits need to be flipped on.
Here is my channel.conf file:
sought.rules.yerp.org
Here is the error from sa-u
On Sat, 03 May 2008 11:51:32 -0400, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
> application.
>
> Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
> because of RBL checks, fo
y send attachments as
true attachments.
That is really a matter of taste, when it is pure ascii, i prefer it
inline myself :)
Best regards,
Olivier
Thanks Paul
--
Paul Griffith |Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering - York University
CSE Technical Team |4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, Canad
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:36:22 -0500, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Paul Griffith wrote:
I guess I could write rules that verify a valid .tex and .bib
document and then assign a minus score, it would be better if
e-mail clients actually send attachments a
% The following shows a little of the typesetting power of LaTeX
\begin{eqnarray}
E = mc^2 \\
m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{document}
For more info on LaTEx see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX
Thanks
Paul
--
Paul Griffith |Dep
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:57:00 -0400, Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:59 -0400 Paul Griffith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I want to add a patch to 20_ratware.cf so I can extend
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK
to handle the new Outlook Messa
=4162&action=view
Thanks
Paul
--
Paul Griffith |Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering
CSE Technical Team |4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M3J-1P3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |CSE1003A|Tel: 416-736-2100 x70258|Fax: 416-736-5872
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:49:33 -0400, Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Paul Griffith wrote:
Greetings SA users,
I have a question that many of you have had to deal with. In our
setup we use Exim to call SA. Here is the issue, we reject anything
over a score
5.0. If a user that is
Greetings SA users,
I have a question that many of you have had to deal with. In our setup we
use Exim to call SA. Here is the issue, we reject anything over a score
5.0. If a user that is in my whitelist sends a spammy e-mail with a score
over 5.0, the mail is rejected.
i.e
This is wha
Here is summary of all the responses. Thanks to all who resonded, your
suggestions have been very helpful.
We will
- reduce the number of SA max-children
- look at ratelimit in exim
- only spam scan messages under a certain size
Aaron Wolfe
We reduce the messages bound fo
Greetings,
How do you handle Spam surges/DoS attacks? We just had a Spam surge/DoS
and are looking at ways to better withstand (as best as we can) another
surge
Here is how we start SA:
-c -d -r $PIDFILE -s /var/log/spamd --socketpath=$SOCKET
--max-children=150 --min-children=10
Our (
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:17:16 -0400, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 05:39 18-07-2007, Paul Griffith wrote:
See this link:
http://www.cse.yorku.ca/~paulg/missed-spam.html
Both messages scored 13.9 and hits FH_FROMEML_NOTLD,RDNS_NONE,
URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:30:38 -0400, SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 21:31 17-07-2007, Debbie D wrote:
But I am still getting way to many spams.. more than I did before the
update -- cialis, viagra, all kinds of meds, all scoring between 0.6
and 3.5
Post a link to some of these emails incl
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:31:44 -0400, Debbie D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am so frustrated.. updated cpanel the other day to
WHM 11.2.0 cPanel 11.6.0-C15032
FEDORA 4 i686 - WHM X v3.1.0
Exim 4.66 on a Linux box
But I am still getting way to many spams.. more than I did before the
update --
Greetings,
I am trying to trackdown why some spam is scoring the way it is. Take a
look at the sample header at the end of the e-mail.
Using spamd and exim I will get a score of 2.6, but in if I call
spamassassin from the command line I get a score of 8.1.
via exim/spamd
X-Spam-Checker-
17 matches
Mail list logo
