concerned parents' and NIMBY crowds lobbied against the deal, and won,
> based on a lot of unfounded nonsense.
> Kind of a bummer, really... especially since these same types of folks
> would end up calling people like me at AT&T Wireless and complaining
> about their poor cov
e would think.
O
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 48
2.64), it's fine as well.
TIA,
Owen
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 48
ences - http://www.ige.unicamp.br - UNICAMP
>
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 48
xpiration date: 16 Oct 2005 17:25:32
That Status: Locked doesn't look too good.
Neither the root servers or the two referenced in the above lookup know nothing
about the domain, so it's totally up the creek...
O
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McSha
as they obviously
contained spam content).
Plus with all the spam I get, it brought my machine to it's knees on several
occasions ;)
O
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 48
?
>
Should be OK as long as the two boxes have the same OS.
I already do this using ssh, with no shared nfs mount i.e:
ssh SAserver "/usr/bin/sa-learn --dbpath /path_to_homedirs/owen/.spamassassin
--[spam|ham]"
Owen
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
.202
>
> (I have my own custom vuserinfo script, which simply returns the user's
> default directory,as they are not real users, hence the use of -v to get
> per-user settings/bayes etc.)
>
> Has anyone come across this, or can anyone recommend a solution?
>
> T
s anyone come across this, or can anyone recommend a solution?
Thanks,
Owen
--
Via Net.Works UK Ltd
Local Touch Global Reach
Owen McShane Systems Administrator
http://www.vianetworks.co.uk Tel +44 (0)1925 48
