- Original Message -
From: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:12 AM
Subject: open of auto-whitelist file failed
Hi
SA 3.2.4 on FC3
spamd is started by script and is running as root.
maillog shows various users with
spamd[5648]
Hi
SA 3.2.4 on FC3
spamd is started by script and is running as root.
maillog shows various users with
spamd[5648]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed:
auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path
/home/domain/domain71/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
No such file or directory
Hi
a list user offered an fix to help sort out bounce messages.
in my mail logs i see
Jun 16 10:23:54 proteus2 spamd[14855]: config: not parsing,
'allow_user_rules' is 0: meta BOUNCED_SPAM (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE && BAYES_99)
meta BOUNCED_SPAM (ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE && BAYES_99) is in user_prefs fo
- Original Message -
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Obantec Support wrote:
i looked over the above and m
- Original Message -
From: "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mails
On Wed, June 4, 2008 16:04, Jack Gostl wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions?
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=argoscomp.com&
Hi
Just built SA3.2.4 on FC3 and running spamassassin --lint i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4]# spamassassin --lint
[29374] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Bareword
"Mail::SpamAssassin::Constants::CHARSETS_LIKELY_TO_FP_AS_CAPS" not allowed
while "strict subs" i
Hi
Running SA3.2.3 but seeing a lot of bounced emails being sent to my
customers. (not emails they are sending out but faked returns)
various subjects
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Delivery Status
- Original Message -
From: "Martin.Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin Users" ;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: SA date on 2 tmp file 1970
Mark
you mean 3.2.3 rather than 2.3.2??? ;-)
--
martin
Yes!
Hi
SA 2.3.2 on FC3
time and date on server is correct but during routine checks i found to
files in /tmp
.spamassassin12592Gefj53tmp
.spamassassin12592PV3qZLtmp
both dated Jan/70
gone now but should i worry about the date?
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: sa-update
Obantec Support wrote:
Hi
i run sa-update from cron and last update
Hi
i run sa-update from cron and last update seems to be Oct18 2007
running spamassassin 3.2.3 on FC3
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002003
updates_spamassassin_org.cf
first line is # UPDATE version 585505
not seen any reports on list of sa-update issues any pointers welcomed.
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Matthias Häker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin-users"
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo
John D. Hardin schrieb:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Obantec Support wr
Hi
3.2.3 SA on FC3
just need to ensure i have the master .procmailrc syntax correct for spamc
i am using
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* < 512000
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$HOME/mail/spam
do i need to use the lock as per the procmail.example which uses
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 512
Hi
just upgraded to 3.2.3 from 3.1.3
now using spamd seeing this in maillog
Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM__TIMES_2 has
dependency 'FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D' with a zero score
Sep 29 10:37:18 proteus2 spamd[6801]: rules: meta test FM_SEX_HOST has
dependency 'FH_HO
Hi
i just received a few emails with no body but subject
Subject: tsg SAVE 82%: VIAGR*, AMBIE*, CIALI*, XANA*, RIVOTRI*,
LEVITR*,CIPRO, MERIDI*, CELEBRE*, VALIU* thought
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=failed
version=3.1.3
any idea how to trap this sort of spam.
Hi
this is the first spam i have seen with this header
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on
proteus2.obantec.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=failed
version=3.1.3
Subject: Fwd: You Need a Better Degree,{} and we can Help!
b
Hi
i am reading the link http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
then the .pm file and do not have a plugins directory. where does the .pm
file go?
i assume the .cf goes in /etc/mail/spamassassin
and i edit v310.pre then restart spamd
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Hamish Marson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Duncan Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: 0451.com
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Duncan Hill wrote:
> > On Monday 07 August 2006 00:02, wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Wylie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 2:38 PM
Subject: 0451.com
> A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to
> check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether it is
> genuinely just
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: sa-update (sa v 3.1.4)
Hi Theo
your right i just ran sa-update and it updated the
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001003 folder files.
Mark
root 4096 Jul 22 14:18 3.001003
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 3 14:38 updates_spamassassin_org
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2151 Aug 3 14:38 updates_spamassassin_org.cf
i.e. put the udates above the current version directory.
once the 3.001003 is created should i add it to the updatedr path?
Mark
--
Obantec Support
- Original Message -
From: "Beast" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: spam not detected
> Loren Wilton wrote:
> >>
> >> *X-Spam-Status:* No, score=3.8 required=5.2
> >> tests=BAYES_99,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
> >> HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=dis
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: bayes sitewide
> From: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: bayes sitewide
Hi
just changing the bayes line to
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
worked as i no longer see an error on restart and can see bayes files
- Original Message -
From: "Logan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: bayes sitewide
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Obantec Support wrote:
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin exists and is chown root.root and chmod 755
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: bayes sitewide
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Obantec Support [mailto
Hi
i added the lines
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0770
to local.cf and restarted spamd
maillog shows
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes" is
not valid for "bayes_path", skipping: bayes_path
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
thanks for the link http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates it
helped a bit.
how often should i run sa-update? is it something i should s
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
> From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >* Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: SA 3.1.0 spamd error
> * Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi
> >
> > i have just built 3.1.0 using
> > per
Hi
i have just built 3.1.0 using
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local
make
make install
trying to use the start-up script as root i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamd]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start
Starting spamd: ERROR! spamassassin script is v3.00, but using modules
v3.001003!
SA 3.0.0 is
Hi
is they anything i need to watch out for or can i just stop SA and build the
newer version.
i am thinking of bayes database files. (not using Mysql).
i have read the upgrade file but just want to cross the i's and dot the t's
before jumping in.
Mark
Hi
currently i run SA3.0.0 on FC3 with stock perl 5.8.5 and sendmail 8.13.x
should i upgrade to the 3.1 path or continue on the 3.0 path
Mark
Hi
lately i am seeing a few blank emails either 0Kb or 1Kb size. No body or
subject.
SA 3.0.0 header
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=4.5 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_DIALIN,
MISSING_SUBJECT,MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID autolearn=no version=3.0.0
anyone else getting these?
Mark
--
No virus found in this
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: koko petrol spams
> > > > anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomchars.gif)
> > > > i assume others have received them on this list.
> > >
> > > Can you exp
- Original Message -
From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: koko petrol spams
> Hi Mark
>
> Obantec Support wrote:
> > anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomch
Hi
SA3.0.0 on FC3
anyone got a way of scoring these spam's (randomchars.gif)
i assume others have received them on this list.
Mark
--
Obantec Support
www.obantec.net
0845 458 3121
WebHosting and Domains
Nominet UK Member & IPStag Holder
CentralNic Accredited Reseller
Hi
FC3
I am running SA 3.0 & clamav 0.87.1 clamav-milter 0.87 (the addition of the
latter has cut back on the virus emails big-time.
what else can i add to reduce spam and viruses.
Mark
t;
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: seeing a few new spams with low SA scoring
> From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>[ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ]
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
Hi
i have SA3.0 on FC3 with spam delivered to $HOME/mail/spam
quota's enabled for /home where users live & /var where users mail lives.
problem is the ownership is $uid.$gid of said user which means it eats into
the quota of the user if they don't read and delete the spam.
normal mail is delive
18:05:13 proteus2a spamd[7352]: write failed to Bayes
journal /var/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_journal (0 of 1960)!
Mark
--
Obantec Support
www.obantec.net
0845 458 3121
WebHosting and Domains
Nominet UK Tag Holder
CentralNic Accredited Reseller
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs
> At 03:58 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: Shared Bayes but users own user_prefs
> At 01:52 PM 10/27/2004, Obantec Support wrote:
&
Hi
SA2.63
I wonder if anyone has a sitewide config for having the bayes files under
the spamd users .spamassassin directory and still let users have their own
$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Or is this not possible.
I don't want the bayes files to add to the users quota.
Mark
Hi
Earlier i had a customers bayes_* files look like they could not write but
this turned out to be quota's
Now i am getting same error on my test domain
Oct 26 22:11:14 proteus2a spamd[867]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at port 46241
Oct 26 22:11:14 proteus2a spamd[3011]: in
does effect the users quota. he
has 8MB of auto_whitlist which is not helping his quota
Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re
aving this problem.
Mark
--
Obantec Support
www.obantec.net
0845 458 3121
WebHosting and Domains
Nominet UK Tag Holder
CentralNic Accredited Reseller
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Obantec Support'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: 2 drug emails low scores SA2.63 0.0 & SA2.64 0.
Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: 2 drug emails low scores SA2.63 0.0 & SA2.64 0.1
> Mark
>
> What extra rules have you in /etc/mail/spamassin? Any from the
> rulesemporium.com, specifcally antidr
Hi
Just had 2 emails to 2 different servers same email but very low scoring.
The subject so far are
Subject: Domains, Don't C1ick here & Subject: Mark, Don't C1ick here
where first was to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and second was to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do get other drug emails but the low score on the
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: **Bounced** folder setting help
> Obantec Support wrote on Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:03:10 +0100:
>
> > Since there is no path etc where is the config for this "Folder"?
> >
>
> in the .procmailrc ? It's got
ot;?
Mark
--
Obantec Support
www.obantec.net
0845 458 3121
WebHosting and Domains
Nominet UK Tag Holder
CentralNic Accredited Reseller
Hi
I have upgraded from 2.60 to 2.64 but the test
spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out locks up.
spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out works as expected.
Any ideas?
Mark
53 matches
Mail list logo
