Re: How to avoid spam analysis when unnecessary

2007-11-18 Thread Noiano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Matt Kettler wrote: > Noiano wrote: >> McDonald, Dan wrote: >>> Ah, I gave you the syntax backwards. Should be: >>> priority SUBJECT_IN_BLACKLIST -500 > > Odds are that change is irrelevant. In SA 3.2.3 at lea

Re: How to avoid spam analysis when unnecessary

2007-11-17 Thread Noiano
ts the subject rule. Is there anything else that needs to be done? Thanks Noiano -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iE8DBQFHPvRw+JjGoasQ6NIRCJPMAOCaX4KhDJg/wZjKkB83sngr2R7tRwkrmSTB C25eAN4lLUirhdpn3I7kyqDS7qHS8PFKdlRB00i0jhFo =awN/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: How to avoid spam analysis when unnecessary

2007-11-17 Thread Noiano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 McDonald, Dan wrote: > in whatever.pre: > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit Done, I have put that line into init.pre > > > in local.cf > > ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit > > priority -500 SUBJECT_IN_BLAC

Re: How to avoid spam analysis when unnecessary

2007-11-17 Thread Noiano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 mouss wrote: > The best approach is to not pass such messages to SA. How to do this > depends on how you call SA. > I cannot do that as SA is called through evolution mail. Thanks Noiano PS: I post to this list using gmane. Is it po

How to avoid spam analysis when unnecessary

2007-11-16 Thread Noiano
Can anyone help? Thanks for you time Noiano PS: SpamAssassin v3.2.1 on perl 5.8.8, OS:ubuntu linux 7.04 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iE8DBQFHPdVD+JjGoasQ6NIRCHFCAN40tdDdtmatHjZrjKDUm0x03pU8PHKF1mWA v/bgAN9cjRrZJq62/sMbLUsVgvfkQkPhUmoDaBxqEpSH =CZMN -END PGP SIGNATURE-