Re: better solution?

it (like amavis) -- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: I'm thinking about suing Microsoft

y "The only way to completely secure a computer is to unplug it" :p The ultimate windows security accessory, A pair of scissors to cut the power cable :D --- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: spam attacks - so and so wrote about a stock

Ken A wrote: > Now, how to know what spammers are going to send before they send it.. That doesn't sound like an open source project. ;-) Sounds more like an open-skull project to me :D I'll get my coat! ------- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: I'm getting killed with spammers

ds and i'm still getting notably higher volumes of spam (on all my accounts in fact!!) Tis an epidemic I tells ya! ------ Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Learn times

s/words of wisdom/reassurances at this point would be welcomed! ------ Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: sa-learn and "Caught" spams

ther delete them, or move them to > an archive directory. Using this method, nothing is ever learned > twice. Also, (if you do your sorting properly) nothing is ever > learned incorrectly. That's basicly what I have in mind! -- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: sa-learn and "Caught" spams

just the once seems to make some sense to me :D --- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

Re: sa-learn and "Caught" spams

I already make use of their checksums to avoid duplicating files and I had intended to use it to remove old spam anyway. Ta guys, much food for thought :D -- Mike Woods Systems Administrator

sa-learn and "Caught" spams

ommon patterns in spams to identify them as spam but im unsure if adding known spams in would be beneficial in this ? Ta for any help! --- Mike Woods Systems Administrator