RE: Personal Rule

I used the second option and had a couple of problems. First problem was quickly solved; double underscores needed to stop the header rules adding to the score. Second problem is that the "blank" name is scoring the same as if it were the wrong name. > From: Mike Spamassassin [

RE: Personal Rule

ontains ernstoff.net then check for To: real name contains Mike or Michael or is blank? > From: Mike Spamassassin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > From: Mike Spamassassin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> I have seen a rule to identify that the "

Re: Personal Rule

So far so good. I have given this rule a score of 1. 4 is classified as spam and 2 is filtered into a MaybeSpam folder. I have implemented the rule to allow blank/Mike/Michael > From: "Mike Spamassassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>I have seen a rule to identify that

RE: Personal Rule

Thanks for your help. I will try this out, and see how it goes. Presumably it could be amended to check for Mike, Michael or blank to avoid the problem you mentioned. I will look up the regular expression syntax and see if I can suss it out. > From: Mike Spamassassin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Personal Rule

I have seen a rule to identify that the "From" address does not have a "real name", which I presume is the description (i.e. in my case "Mike Spamassassin"). I would like to have a rule which identifies emails where the "To" address does not contain either &

Re: sa-learn error message

>> Everything seems to work OK, but I get one error message. >> When I run sa-learn --sync I get >> "Parameter to use lib must be directory, not file at >> $HOME/local/lib/perl5/i386-linux/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 13" > > Just from the error message, I would assume you had set up Razor, or at >

sa-learn error message

I have installed SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on Debian Linux using the SingleUserUnixInstall instructions on the SpamAssassin Wiki, as I do not have root access. Perl version is 5.6.1 Everything seems to work OK, but I get one error message. When I run sa-learn --sync I get "Parameter to use lib must be di

Re: Is there such a test?

o the original question: Regardless of whether anyone thinks it is a good test or not, has anyone yet created such a test? > Mike Spamassassin wrote: > >>Point taken, but I still think it would be a valid test. >>Like all SpamAssassin tests it should only be one of many indicators

Re: Is there such a test?

le to pick out those from "Microsoft Support" which are not from microsoft.com and other typical phishing mails. > At 10:00 AM 3/15/2005, Mike Spamassassin wrote: >>I have just received spam from >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Is there a test which identifies that the descr

Is there such a test?

I have just received spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a test which identifies that the description (Esmeralada Bouchard) bears no resemblance to the given sender's address? Similarly I sometimes receive spam mail to my email address but with a completely unrecognisable description. Are there