Re: OT - massive newsletter

2007-09-22 Thread Mick Pollard
allows people to subscribe and unsubscribe and takes care of > > verification of subscriptions. > > > > I don't know how it would behave under a 10M-subscriber load, though. > > I have never used this software but it looks like it might be better suited to what

Pyzor and Spamassassin 3.0.6

2007-03-11 Thread Mick
Hello. This is driving me nuts. After installing DCC, Razor2 and Pyzor and then running: spamassassin -D < sample-spam.txt at the end of the test, I get: debug: tests=AWL,DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,GTUBE,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK plus: X

Re: backscatter from a joejob is killing me

2006-11-22 Thread Mick Pollard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation Anyone using BATV already ? Hi all, This may be useful. I haven't had a proper look but it is on my ( long ) todo list. http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html Regards Mick Pollard __lunix__

Re: Top 10 ASN and CIDR's for 18 Nov

2006-11-18 Thread Mick Pollard
otal spams: 543 Total ASNs: 143 Hi, Just out of curiosity, what do you use to compile these stats ? Regards Mick Pollard Head Geek Lunix Solutions

Re: SA RPMs for Suse 10.0?

2006-07-13 Thread Mick Pollard
Just d'l the source tar ball and build rpm's from it. /*rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.3.tar.gz* /That should produce a binary RPM for you. I have not tested it yet. Regards Mick Pollard __lunix-aus__/ / Paul Hutchings wrote: I have a Suse 10.0 system running Spamassassin fro

Re: Auto delete if >= X on per user basis

2006-06-06 Thread Mick Pollard
` # `test -d $DEFAULT/.spam` # if( $RETURNCODE == 1) # { # `maildirmake $DEFAULT/.spam ` # } # exception { # to "$DEFAULT/.spam/" # } #} # Regards Mick Pollard __lunix-aus__

Good way to get spammed?

2005-05-31 Thread Mick Szucs
I'm trying to get some spam delivered to my filter boxes so I can gauge their effectiveness on a day to day basis. Though it seems that I've got no trouble getting spam I don't want, I'm not having a lot of luck getting spam now that I do want it. Ideas, anyone? Spammer bait? Thanks, Mick

Re: setup spamassassin on Fedora 2

2005-05-20 Thread Mick Szucs
and greatest pre-built at atrpms.net: http://www.atrpms.net/ Along with handy yum, apt-get and up2date config help. Mick

SpamAssassin 3.0.3 errors - connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed - attempt 2

2005-05-17 Thread Mick Szucs
utes ago. Any ideas as to what's going on and what I can do to keep it from happening again? As a kludge for now I'm going to have cron restart spamd every few hours. Mick

SpamAssassin 3.0.3 errors - connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed

2005-05-13 Thread Mick Szucs
am until a user complained and I restarted spamd a few minutes ago. Any ideas as to what's going on and what I can do to keep it from happening again? As a kludge for now I'm going to have cron restart spamd every few hours. Mick

Re: SA 3.0.3 SURBL problem - resolved

2005-05-12 Thread Mick Szucs
Mick Szucs wrote: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on Fedora Core 2. I'm trying to set up SURBL from the instructions at www.surbl.org Thank you to Martin Hepworth who pointed out that the plugin needs to be loaded via /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre: $ cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre # URIDNSBL -

SA 3.0.3 SURBL problem

2005-05-12 Thread Mick Szucs
BL SpamAssassin test, skipping: (Can't locate object method "check_uridnsbl" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 2340.) Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! Regards, Mick

Re: Upgrade from 2.64 to 3.0.3 - Pyzor issues resolved

2005-05-11 Thread Mick Szucs
Mick Szucs wrote: 2) Possibly not related to the upgrade specifically, I'm getting the following error from Pyzor 0.4.0: spamd[877]: debug: Pyzor: couldn't grok response "Traceback (most recent call last):" I should add that when I run spammassassin -D --lint Pyzor works

Re: Upgrade from 2.64 to 3.0.3

2005-05-11 Thread Mick Szucs
Mick Szucs wrote: 2) Possibly not related to the upgrade specifically, I'm getting the following error from Pyzor 0.4.0: spamd[877]: debug: Pyzor: couldn't grok response "Traceback (most recent call last):" I should add that when I run spammassassin -D --lint Pyzor works

Upgrade from 2.64 to 3.0.3

2005-05-11 Thread Mick Szucs
yzor 0.4.0: spamd[877]: debug: Pyzor: couldn't grok response "Traceback (most recent call last):" but when I run: # pyzor check < spammail 66.250.40.33:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0 Assistance would be greatly appreciated! Regards, Mick