On 4/18/15, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 18 April 2015 at 17:16:40 (EU time), Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have another question.
>>
>> It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores
>> for the same email.
>
>
Hi,
I have another question.
It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores
for the same email.
In particular, I have noticed that points are omitted for
RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS (Spamhaus blacklist) sometimes. Why?
Is the difference due to a difference in how spamassassin is invoked
I think you are right.
Running spamassassin manually appears to use the user's "user_prefs"
configuration file, and bayes database. I need to get amavisd to do it
that way too, if possible.
On 1/18/15, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Michael Williamson wrote:
>
utolearn=no
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Level: **
On 1/18/15, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:06:00 -0700
> Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>> Yes, amavisd is running and modifying the file
>> "/etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf" h
Yes, amavisd is running and modifying the file
"/etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf" has an effect on the spamassassin header
messages added to emails. Thanks, that answers that question.
Now, the next question is, if I manually run
# spamassassin -t < spam_filename
I get a different, much higher spam sc
tatus spamd
RETVAL=$?
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop|restart|status|condrestart}"
RETVAL=1
;;
esac
exit $RETVAL
On 1/17/15, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of January 17, 2015 4:20:36 PM -0700, Michael Williamson is alleged to
>
>
Hi, I have a question.
Spamassassin seems not to be getting the configuration changes that I make.
I add (or change) lines like this
add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_
required_score 4.0
to both /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and
/home//.spamassassin/user_prefs,
I check the file permissions to b
