Re: blacklist by sender description, not by send e-mail address?

2014-10-20 Thread Michael Opdenacker
Greetings, On 10/17/2014 06:37 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 10/17/2014 12:13 PM, Axb wrote: >> On 10/17/2014 06:02 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I'm receiving a specific type of spam which From header is always like: >>&g

blacklist by sender description, not by send e-mail address?

2014-10-17 Thread Michael Opdenacker
t? If this is true, how would you give a penalty to messages with a sender description containing " foobar" (need to match the space before the recurring string too)? Any tips are welcome! Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com +33 484 258 098

Re: Give a penalty to messages with non latin UTF-8 characters?

2014-10-17 Thread Michael Opdenacker
exactly my point. As long as characters are in utf-8, ok_locales doesn't trigger. And ok_languages needs a sufficient number of characters to trigger. A subject with only Chinese characters in UTF-8 isn't enough. Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel

Re: Give a penalty to messages with non latin UTF-8 characters?

2014-08-29 Thread Michael Opdenacker
Hi, On 08/25/2014 05:17 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > > Is there a simple way to give a penalty to messages containing non latin > UTF-8 characters? > > I'm asking because we are receiving quite a lot of Chinese junk mail > with subjects in Chinese (or more generally non

Re: Give a penalty to messages with non latin UTF-8 characters?

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Opdenacker
On 08/25/2014 05:17 PM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using SpamAssassin 4.0. Oops, I meant 3.4 :) > > Is there a simple way to give a penalty to messages containing non latin > UTF-8 characters? > > I'm asking because we are receiving quite

Give a penalty to messages with non latin UTF-8 characters?

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Opdenacker
in, for example e-mails sent to the LKML, which most of us subscribe to. I'm seeing fairly elaborate solutions on the net, but it surprises me that an apparently simple problem doesn't have a simple solution yet. Thank you in advance for your insights. Cheers, Michael. -- Mich