nt. But normally HP
have dynamic power and can "shuts down" a not used power supply.
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Paulus Buijsstraat 191
2613 HR Delft
www.taos-it.nl
KvK Haaglanden nr. 27254410
Denk aan het milieu; is het afdrukken van deze e-mail echt noodzakelijk?
want to help you but I'm sorry you don't want my answer
Sorry *.nl user.
Better luck in your next life ;)
With kind regards,
met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Paulus Buijsstraat 191
2613 HR Delft
www.taos-it.nl
KvK Haaglanden nr. 27254410
Denk aan het milieu; is het afdrukken van deze e-mail echt noodzakelijk?
an-in-the-middle attacks and now we have to introduce a
man-in-the-middle. It isn't a attack but it is breaking all our contracts.
With kind regards,
met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Paulus Buijsstraat 191
2613 HR Delft
www.taos-it.nl
KvK Haa
ot kill every other spamkiller (application or
person)
met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Paulus Buijsstraat 191
2613 HR Delft
www.taos-it.nl<http://www.taos-it.nl/>
KvK Haaglanden nr. 27254410
From:
rs not being
> correctly configured.
>
> 2. I see the tarpit of creating a high ranking MX which would capture
> information of spammers that would be dropped into a reject list.
>
> Does this fairly describe what we are talking about here?
>
> Ralf, or Wietse what do you think of these 2 techniques?
> I basically dropped greylisting last week because of the headaches it was
> causing with multiple sending smtp servers, and I have seen a huge increase
> in spam, method one here sounds like a great replacement.
>
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
his is just a figure of speech.
On lists that do not have subscription moderation, users can add
themselves to the ``allow'' database in the same way. This is documented
only briefly in the USER'S manual.
Archive access may also be restricted to subscribers. Like subscribers
of the list or the digest list, addresses in the ``allow'' database are
allowed to access the archive.
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Never mind. I needed more coffee
AWL score was the reason
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:03 +0100, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the default scores for all the tests below and doesn't know where
> the score comes from.
> Could somebody help?
>
>
> 2006-1
Hello,
I have the default scores for all the tests below and doesn't know where
the score comes from.
Could somebody help?
2006-12-01 15:33:51.100434500 [5834] info: spamd: connection from
capella.taos-it.nl [127.0.0.1] at port 51166
2006-12-01 15:33:51.152649500 [5834] info: spamd: processing m
er day for
there fax machine.
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 14:16 -0500, Peter H. Lemieux wrote:
> For your amusement. A spam arriving here today from Taiwan reads:
>
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> We learnt your e-mail add.from internet.
>
> FIRST OF ALL,PL
r are there more (Dutch) users seeing
this.
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
ve
> spammers figure [EMAIL PROTECTED] will also have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too bad
> for them...they do not. :)
>
But I also have one client which gets a lot of spam to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So one stupid spammer did put smtp before the usernames.
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
the rest there is one question i fail to find
> any answer to: Do every machine need its own db or can they share?
I share them without any problem
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
I have SPF installed and it is working with RDJ or manual install.
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 08:52 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Only use that if you have the SPF plugin loaded.
>
> Maybe someone could add
>
> ifplugin..
> en
]
config: failed to parse line, skipping: whitelist_from_spf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All others are working perfect
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
on the moment. But I'm not even seeing a LN also.
Maybe i'm off there spamlist ;) but I think i'm just lucky for a few
hours.
Maurice Lucas
ll really appreciated.
also check
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/11/spamharvest.pdf
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> > I submitted wealthpro.us.MUNGED.tt to uribl but he isn't added because
> > SA will only see us.MUNGED.tt.
>
> I'm not sure why you think
check the website at us.MUNGED.tt they use a countrycode.tt
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
rom serious users and admins.
They won't register that many domain names but if we, the serious
admins, do register we will use and pay for that domain.
and I like to give my money to a registrar that is doing whatever it
cost to keep the internet usable.
If Go Daddy does give the data of all the registrations there isn't any
need for whois queries.
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
angerous and misused but free
advertising for the provider) rule which will be a negative scoring
rule.
I would "love" to see in every spam message spammers mis-using my good
name to lower the amount of point. (possible problems like the good-old
bayes poisoning)
In this example yahoo is
in old wget has this options to show the outputted
html.
My 5 cents: geocities gets enough money from displaying these sites and
have a name which will keep them from getting world wide blacklisted.
Now it is only on peoples local blacklist but I like the idea for a
world wide (URIBL, SURBL,...) blacklist entry.
Maybe a poll on the major blacklist sites could help. When could we
change "big and with a lot of good guys" into "big and with a lot of
good guys and to much bad guys, so sorry for the few good guys"
--
with kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
> * 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never gets
corrupted
Maurice Lucas
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 17:44 +0100, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
> I catch them all, for example:
>
> X
res.cf:score DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 0.736 0 1.122 0.478
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0.0001 0.0001 3.5 3.5
0.5+3.5 is shown in the spam-report
Maurice Lucas
21% of all the SURBL hitting spam hit more then 4 list records. If this
where a FN (not very likely but possible) then the score would be to
high to compensate but if we use a scoring rule like above then the
score of a 4+ hiting spam message would be e.g.
basic SURBL score = 3
3*fixed value = 1
score = 6
and maybe with a SURBL list with very low FP score there could be a gain
in the fixed value score.
Maurice Lucas
spamd: clean message*'
/var/log/spamd/clean
with kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
ster'
Anyone found a way to effectively dunk this stuff?
Yes, I'm feeding them all to Bayes. :-)
Add uribl to your setup it will add 3 point to this URI
www.uribl.com
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
you don't need
like so many other mailserver software.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
uot; <{%MAIL_FROM}>
To: "{%NAME_TO}" <{%MAIL_TO}>
Subject: Victoire Whidbee Just do it
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:03:59 -0500
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
ow the FP count of these
rules
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I have a problem with both 3.1.0-rc1 and 3.1.0-rc2.
Some off my mail is checked by SA and marked as spam but gets an extra LF
causing the rest of my tools to ignore the X-Spam-
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So there are two Message-ID headers in this mail but only one is in the
headers the other is in the body.
Another strange thing with all these messages is the insertion of the 3D
before every score.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
=BAYES_80=2,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=3.496,MISSING_HEADERS=0.119,
MISSING_SUBJECT=1.226 autolearn=no version=3.0.4
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:04 AM
The wiki server is down
Making HTTP connection to wiki.apache.org
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
I hate to reply myself but forget it he is back online
Met vriendelijke groet,
Ma
Hello,
The wiki server is down
Making HTTP connection to wiki.apache.org
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
.com/
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
change in the static
score's
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Hello,
I didn't read this discussion but did found a link on the clamav mailinglist
which I want to share before reading 300 emails ;)
http://weir.dattitu.de/archives/9-Filtering-Sober-P.html
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
- Original Message -
From: "Christian R
Hello,
Send a complete sample to spam \-at/ timj.co.uk for addition to
http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
- Original Message -
From: "Ronald I. Nutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesd
s getting this update?
Yep, for several days now.
It is repaired
I can browse the site
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
By just checking the SA website I found out that there is a 3.0.2 release
from 2004-12-16.
Why isn't there an announce from the announce list?
Archives on GMANE and MARC are both out of date.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
with kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Ma
For the archives,
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 09:32, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I use spamd and spamc with SA3.0 in a sitewide configuration.
A few percentage of all my connections keeps the spamc call in memory.
After a 500 connections I have 23 times "/usr/local/bin/spamc -c -u spamd"
in my ps l
t 3.0 is inherently less memory efficient than 2.6x;
but
probably not by a huge amount.
I think that when the first three problems are addressed and solved that
3.0
will become a whole lot more generally usable.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
their own
seperate tag. Is this possible?
A second SA instance with a score of 0.1 and a subject line of
***non-spam***
with kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
From: "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:32 AM
I use spamd and spamc with SA3.0 in a sitewide configuration.
A few percentage of all my connections keeps the spamc call in memory.
After a 500 connections I have 23 times "/usr/local/bin/spamc -
the why of this.
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
;version, "\n";
I use debian woody so Net::DNS version 0.19
I did install SA again from source but the results are the same
Does anybody have any glue
Or is this an error for the perl mailinglist?
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3,AWL=3.193,
BAYES_20=-1.951 autolearn=ham version=3.0.0
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
option from my spamc call?
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
the
configuration.
Could I still use lock_method flock ?
I don't use NFS
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
a way to force spamassassin to write bayes_toks to his homedir?
Or do I have some other problems?
I had the same problem with 2.64 but I was only testing on the moment so 3.0
is there on the right time ;)
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
52 matches
Mail list logo
